A. Sabalenka
To Win
E. Mertens
To Win
Talia Gibson vs Elise Mertens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W L W L W W L WHead-To-Head: Gibson 0 - 0 Mertens
| Gibson | Stats | Mertens |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (13-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (19-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 140 | Ranking | 26 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 12 |
| 20 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 20 |
| 64% (154-86) | Career Total W/L | 63% (465-269) |
| $277,440 | Career Prize Money | $9,094,391 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Wakana Sonobe
Player
Talia Gibson
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Rebecca Marino
73%
(
80 of
110)
1st Serve %
72%
(
97 of
135)
10
Aces
29
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
74 of
97)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
28 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
135)
128
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Sohyun Park
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Han Shi
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Francesca Curmi
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mia Pohankova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Veronika Podrez
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Lisa Zaar
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Talia Gibson
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elise Mertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Elise Mertens
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Varvara Gracheva
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
78)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elise Mertens
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Peyton Stearns
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Elise Mertens
59%
(
76 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
123)
5
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
9
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
33%
(
17 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
54 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-2 6-7(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Kimberly Birrell
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (154/86) | Win/Loss | 63% (465/269) |
| 62% (348/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1020/658) |
| 55% (2821/2331) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (8360/6793) |
| 67% (129/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (272/142) |
| 40% (2/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (108/64) |
| 60% (18/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (51/32) |
| 42% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (34/31) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 769 | Aces Total | 1860 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 812 | Total Double Faults | 2569 |
| 1:36:16 | Average Match Time | 1:17:20 |
| 381.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.43 |
| 64% (10226/15940) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22404/37936) |
| 66% (6751/10226) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (14846/22404) |
| 47% (2703/5713) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (7002/15523) |
| 46% (905/1952) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2430/5085) |
| 45% (7265/16120) | Return Points Win % | 46% (18110/39215) |
| 46% (6/7) | Slam W/L | 68% (78/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 52% (65/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 64% (9/5) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 63% (165/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (122/70) | Challenger W/L | 61% (83/52) |
| 86% (24/4) | Futures W/L | 81% (65/15) |
| 64% (152/238) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (457/722) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 61% (38/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (64/139) |
| 48% (37/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/207) |
| 87% (151/132) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (463/409) |
| 13% (151/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (463/53) |
| 25% (89/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (271/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
