Q. Halys
To Win
L. Darderi
To Win
Quentin Halys vs Pablo Cuevas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
L W L W L W L L L LHead-2-Head: Halys 1 - 2 Cuevas
They have played 9 sets in total, with Halys winning 3 and Cuevas winning 6. The last match between Halys and Cuevas was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 13-05-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Quentin Halys getting the victory 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Quentin Halys | 1 |
| Pablo Cuevas | 2 |
Bordeaux Challenger(13-05-2022)
5
7
7
6
6
4
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Jones VS Siegemund PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Quentin Halys
Player
Pablo Cuevas
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Quentin Halys
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(6) |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
81 of
132)
19
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
9
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
57 of
81)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
30 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
132)
130
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 46 | Games Won | 53 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 29 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:22:1 | Average Match Time | 2:22:1 |
| 65% (217/332) | 1st Serve % | 61% (194/319) |
| 70% (151/217) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (140/194) |
| 51% (59/115) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (72/125) |
| 29% (8/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
| 34% (107/319) | Return Points Win % | 37% (122/332) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Quentin Halys
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
4
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
50 of
61)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Quentin Halys
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Quentin Halys
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Luca Nardi
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
23 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
18
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Pavel Kotov
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
11
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Pablo Cuevas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Pablo Cuevas
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Pablo Cuevas
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Pablo Cuevas
44%
(
32 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Pablo Cuevas
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Stefano Travaglia
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
111)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Pablo Cuevas
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Egor Gerasimov
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
7
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
58 of
78)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
33 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Pablo Cuevas
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (417/320) | Win/Loss | 60% (570/384) |
| 56% (995/789) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1316/987) |
| 52% (9297/8519) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11625/10526) |
| 56% (125/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (71/86) |
| 54% (110/95) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (466/260) |
| 59% (161/111) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (23/24) |
| 58% (21/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (10/14) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 6209 | Aces Total | 3364 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 3158 | Total Double Faults | 1747 |
| 1:22:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 464.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.93 |
| 59% (27643/47147) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29133/48093) |
| 77% (21422/27643) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (20889/29133) |
| 48% (9332/19504) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (9913/18954) |
| 39% (1482/3836) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1847/4423) |
| 36% (17339/47525) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18617/48717) |
| 50% (38/38) | Slam W/L | 44% (38/48) |
| 40% (12/18) | Masters W/L | 45% (40/49) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (24/8) |
| 48% (55/59) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (195/138) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (227/163) | Challenger W/L | 67% (200/100) |
| 67% (84/41) | Futures W/L | 64% (72/40) |
| 58% (402/689) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (520/855) |
| 34% (12/35) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (40/86) |
| 53% (205/388) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (187/355) |
| 49% (132/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (161/289) |
| 80% (418/335) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (566/487) |
| 20% (418/83) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (566/78) |
| 26% (316/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (387/80) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
