Mariano Navone vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W L L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Navone 0 - 2 Etcheverry
They have played 4 sets in total, with Navone winning 0 and Etcheverry winning 4. The last match between Navone and Etcheverry was at the Montevideo Challenger, 09-11-2022, Second, Clay with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mariano Navone | 0 |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 2 |
Montevideo Challenger(09-11-2022)
| Navone | Stats | Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (12-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 85 | Ranking | 51 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 62% (235-147) | Career Total W/L | 62% (355-218) |
| $786,850 | Career Prize Money | $2,875,165 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Navone VS Etcheverry H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Mariano Navone
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Mariano Navone
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Navone VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 8 | Games Won | 24 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:24:10 | Average Match Time | 1:24:10 |
| 61% (66/109) | 1st Serve % | 69% (57/83) |
| 47% (31/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (41/57) |
| 35% (15/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (12/17) |
| 36% (30/83) | Return Points Win % | 58% (63/109) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mariano Navone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Mariano Navone
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
79%
(
77 of
97)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
54 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Mariano Navone
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
52 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Laslo Djere
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Mariano Navone
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
14 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Corentin Moutet
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (235/147) | Win/Loss | 62% (355/218) |
| 59% (533/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (813/561) |
| 54% (4593/3992) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7036/6014) |
| 33% (8/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (43/46) |
| 65% (225/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (297/155) |
| 29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 364 | Aces Total | 2281 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 955 | Total Double Faults | 842 |
| 1:40:24 | Average Match Time | 1:53:14 |
| 308.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 357.92 |
| 66% (15406/23284) | 1st Serve % | 67% (25804/38236) |
| 62% (9569/15406) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (17871/25804) |
| 48% (3807/7878) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6380/12432) |
| 47% (1388/2966) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1692/4037) |
| 45% (10871/23960) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15899/39422) |
| 20% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 56% (20/16) |
| 33% (5/10) | Masters W/L | 38% (12/20) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 53% (25/22) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (54/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (75/38) | Challenger W/L | 67% (128/62) |
| 65% (126/67) | Futures W/L | 69% (136/62) |
| 62% (229/372) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (334/535) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 54% (51/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (96/193) |
| 53% (71/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (103/188) |
| 83% (230/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (352/294) |
| 17% (230/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (352/56) |
| 28% (152/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (220/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
