M. Keys
To Win
D. Vekic
To Win
Madison Brengle vs Donna Vekic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W L W L
Form
L L L W W L L L W WHead-2-Head: Brengle 1 - 2 Vekic
They have played 7 sets in total, with Brengle winning 3 and Vekic winning 4. The last match between Brengle and Vekic was at the Miami Open - Miami, 24-03-2023, Second, Hard with Donna Vekic getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Madison Brengle | 1 |
| Donna Vekic | 2 |
Miami Open - Miami(24-03-2023)
4
6
6
4
6
3
| Brengle | Stats | Vekic |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 878 | Ranking | 21 |
| 35 | Highest Rank | 17 |
| 35 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 21 | Titles | 9 |
| 56% (559-437) | Career Total W/L | 58% (401-295) |
| $2,482,006 | Career Prize Money | $6,914,696 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Donna Vekic
Player
Madison Brengle
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Madison Brengle
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Donna Vekic
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 29 | Games Won | 32 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 18 |
| 1:24:51 | Average Match Time | 1:24:51 |
| 71% (133/188) | 1st Serve % | 54% (111/204) |
| 55% (73/133) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (73/111) |
| 42% (23/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (35/93) |
| 54% (13/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 64% (14/22) |
| 47% (96/204) | Return Points Win % | 49% (92/188) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Malaika Rapolu
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Anna Frey
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Donna Vekic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Emma Navarro
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Hailey Baptiste
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Donna Vekic
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
4
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
23%
(
7 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Donna Vekic
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Donna Vekic
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
110)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Emma Navarro
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Elina Avanesyan
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Donna Vekic
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Donna Vekic
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Donna Vekic
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (559/437) | Win/Loss | 58% (401/295) |
| 56% (1265/1010) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (901/715) |
| 53% (10759/9707) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7889/7105) |
| 59% (341/236) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (226/160) |
| 52% (118/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (69/58) |
| 55% (55/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (51/42) |
| 50% (45/45) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (55/35) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 309 | Aces Total | 2108 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1536 | Total Double Faults | 2878 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 489.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.19 |
| 71% (29862/42036) | 1st Serve % | 56% (23064/41399) |
| 57% (17065/29862) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (15571/23064) |
| 45% (5430/12178) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (8272/18312) |
| 49% (2838/5795) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2248/4863) |
| 48% (20317/42388) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18236/41786) |
| 38% (41/68) | Slam W/L | 55% (60/49) |
| 41% (31/45) | Masters W/L | 48% (71/77) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 65% (13/7) |
| 48% (113/122) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (158/124) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (364/199) | Challenger W/L | 70% (78/34) |
| 77% (10/3) | Futures W/L | 84% (21/4) |
| 56% (545/972) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (396/689) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 55% (93/170) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (85/179) |
| 48% (140/294) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (125/227) |
| 85% (579/494) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (396/335) |
| 15% (579/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (396/61) |
| 15% (416/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (300/65) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
