Louisa Chirico vs Federica Grazioso Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L L W W L W L W LHead To Head: Chirico 1 - 1 Grazioso
They have played 6 sets in total, with Chirico winning 3 and Grazioso winning 3. The last match between Chirico and Grazioso was at the Daytona Beach, 20-01-2014, Q2 round, Clay with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Louisa Chirico | 1 |
| Federica Grazioso | 1 |
Daytona Beach(20-01-2014)
6
1
3
6
6
4
| Chirico | Stats | Grazioso |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (10-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 151 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 58 | Highest Rank | 600 |
| 28 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (331-262) | Career Total W/L | 47% (92-103) |
| $649,838 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Dominika Salkova
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ana Konjuh
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
85 of
137)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
66 of
137)
137
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Grazioso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-7(2) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (331/262) | Win/Loss | 47% (92/103) |
| 54% (742/633) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (212/233) |
| 52% (6582/6190) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1937/1989) |
| 50% (125/125) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (44/31) |
| 61% (170/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (44/65) |
| 58% (31/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 881 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 2061 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:13:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 458.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.49 |
| 59% (19011/32123) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (11725/19011) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (5838/13110) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (1849/3875) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (14106/31204) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (16/24) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (13/16) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (51/57) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (238/162) | Challenger W/L | 45% (22/27) |
| 81% (13/3) | Futures W/L | 48% (70/76) |
| 55% (321/583) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (91/190) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 57% (85/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (16/28) |
| 54% (108/200) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (30/57) |
| 84% (319/269) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (91/74) |
| 16% (319/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (91/16) |
| 22% (274/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (104/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
