Frederik Nielsen vs Daniiar Duldaev Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L L W L LHead To Head: Nielsen 2 - 0 Duldaev
They have played 6 sets in total, with Nielsen winning 4 and Duldaev winning 2. The last match between Nielsen and Duldaev was at the Bangkok Challenger, 30-12-2017, Q1 round, Hard with Frederik Nielsen getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Frederik Nielsen | 2 |
| Daniiar Duldaev | 0 |
Bangkok Challenger(30-12-2017)
6
2
4
6
6
3
| Nielsen | Stats | Duldaev |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 190 | Highest Rank | 607 |
| 41 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 1 |
| 61% (560-365) | Career Total W/L | 48% (154-164) |
| $69,005 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
46%
(
42 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 32 | Games Won | 24 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:49:24 | Average Match Time | 1:49:24 |
| 54% (97/179) | 1st Serve % | 62% (116/188) |
| 75% (73/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (73/116) |
| 54% (44/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (31/72) |
| 35% (9/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 45% (84/188) | Return Points Win % | 35% (62/179) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frederik Nielsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Frederik Nielsen
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Frederik Nielsen
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Frederik Nielsen
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Frederik Nielsen
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
Frederik Nielsen
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniiar Duldaev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Denys Molchanov
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuuya Kibi
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniiar Duldaev
Player
Chaleechan Tanasugarn
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
46%
(
42 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniiar Duldaev
Player
Ji Hoon Son
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Daniiar Duldaev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (560/365) | Win/Loss | 48% (154/164) |
| 57% (1249/943) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (359/373) |
| 53% (10967/9885) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3380/3417) |
| 62% (222/138) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (130/117) |
| 56% (61/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (20/31) |
| 61% (231/146) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (4/16) |
| 58% (46/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1554 | Aces Total | 308 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1200 | Total Double Faults | 259 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 568.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.73 |
| 60% (17389/29128) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4101/6771) |
| 69% (11956/17389) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2666/4101) |
| 51% (5931/11739) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1309/2670) |
| 42% (1227/2930) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (265/616) |
| 40% (11924/29572) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2540/6543) |
| 50% (9/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (27/25) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (37/39) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (240/178) | Challenger W/L | 45% (29/36) |
| 68% (247/114) | Futures W/L | 49% (125/128) |
| 60% (522/866) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (152/315) |
| 56% (27/48) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (159/299) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (48/94) |
| 62% (177/286) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (45/97) |
| 89% (506/451) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (162/132) |
| 11% (506/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (162/29) |
| 26% (419/107) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (156/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
