Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Acosta 0 - 0 Zandschulp
| Acosta | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (4-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 194 | Ranking | 88 |
| 47 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 24 | Age | 29 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 60% (212-141) | Career Total W/L | 61% (363-228) |
| $611,865 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Acosta VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Facundo Diaz Acosta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
34
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Zizou Bergs
60%
(
93 of
154)
1st Serve %
53%
(
86 of
161)
8
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
9
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
64 of
86)
51%
(
31 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
33%
(
51 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
57 of
161)
160
Total Points Won
155
|
6-7(5) 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Cameron Norrie
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
50 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Ajeet Rai
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (212/141) | Win/Loss | 61% (363/228) |
| 59% (482/339) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (828/593) |
| 54% (4172/3619) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7124/6299) |
| 50% (28/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 63% (184/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/106) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 920 | Aces Total | 2892 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1177 | Total Double Faults | 2142 |
| 1:47:54 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
| 344.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.34 |
| 58% (13922/23943) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24087/39122) |
| 68% (9528/13922) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17215/24087) |
| 51% (5084/10021) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7238/15038) |
| 44% (1162/2650) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1781/4127) |
| 42% (10107/24100) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16381/40296) |
| 31% (5/11) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 13% (1/7) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 50% (25/25) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (97/58) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 68% (84/40) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 62% (208/337) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 48% (52/108) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
| 52% (60/115) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 83% (222/184) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 17% (222/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 22% (130/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (247/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
