Diana Martynov vs Quirine Lemoine Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L L
Form
L L L L L L W W W LHead To Head: Martynov 1 - 0 Lemoine
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martynov winning 2 and Lemoine winning 0. The last match between Martynov and Lemoine was at the W60 Croissy-Beaubourg, 27-03-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Diana Martynov getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diana Martynov | 1 |
| Quirine Lemoine | 0 |
W60 Croissy-Beaubourg(27-03-2022)
6
3
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sevastova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Diana Martynov
Player
Quirine Lemoine
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 0:51:0 | Average Match Time | 0:51:0 |
| 63% (27/43) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 70% (19/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (5/23) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 63% (29/46) | Return Points Win % | 35% (15/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Diana Martynov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Diana Martynov
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
79%
(
60 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ruth Roura Llaverias
Player
Diana Martynov
63%
(
78 of
123)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
46%
(
56 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Diana Martynov
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Celia Anson Sanchez
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Lucia Llinares Domingo
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Diana Martynov
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
0
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
52%
(
35 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 4-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alize Lim
Player
Diana Martynov
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Quirine Lemoine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Quirine Lemoine
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Suzan Lamens
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Erica Oosterhout
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Kurumi Nara
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Quirine Lemoine
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maileen Nuudi
Player
Quirine Lemoine
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Quirine Lemoine
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Quirine Lemoine
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Quirine Lemoine
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Quirine Lemoine
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (168/153) | Win/Loss | 63% (306/180) |
| 52% (381/352) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (658/428) |
| 51% (3523/3337) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5283/4457) |
| 55% (53/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (58/36) |
| 53% (72/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (175/94) |
| 48% (43/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (73/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 327 | Aces Total | 184 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 936 | Total Double Faults | 863 |
| 1:21:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 417.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.2 |
| 69% (11774/17142) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9006/14713) |
| 58% (6872/11774) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5401/9006) |
| 42% (2250/5368) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2477/5707) |
| 49% (1019/2091) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1024/2013) |
| 46% (7651/16553) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7237/14992) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (79/88) | Challenger W/L | 60% (155/105) |
| 58% (89/64) | Futures W/L | 71% (141/57) |
| 52% (165/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (301/475) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (23/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (52/81) |
| 49% (46/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (75/126) |
| 84% (171/143) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (288/262) |
| 16% (171/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (288/25) |
| 17% (150/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (197/44) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
