MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Ugo Humbert [21st] vs Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Humbert 5 - 0 Zandschulp

They have played 12 sets in total, with Humbert winning 11 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Humbert and Zandschulp was at the Wimbledon - London, 03-07-2024, Second, Grass with Ugo Humbert getting the victory 7-6(9) 6-1 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Ugo Humbert 5
Botic Van De Zandschulp 0
Humbert vs Zandschulp H2H Profile
Humbert Stats Zandschulp
63% (12-7) YTD Win/Loss 43% (9-12)
5 Head-to-Head 0
21 Ranking 89
13 Highest Rank 22
26 Age 29
L Plays R
20 Titles 7
61% (356-226) Career Total W/L 62% (362-226)
$5,486,660 Career Prize Money $3,456,920
1 YTD Titles 0
2 Hard H2H 0
2 Clay H2H 0
1 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Humbert VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(9) 6-1 6-3
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61% ( 51 of 84)
1st Serve %
55% ( 57 of 103)
5
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
6
82% ( 42 of 51)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 41 of 57)
64% ( 21 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 18 of 46)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
25% ( 21 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 44 of 103)
107
Total Points Won
80
6-3 6-3
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
50
6-4 6-3
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70% ( 44 of 63)
1st Serve %
65% ( 35 of 54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84% ( 37 of 44)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
32% ( 6 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 20 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 54)
66
Total Points Won
51
6-4 1-6 6-2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 44 of 75)
1st Serve %
61% ( 40 of 66)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
59% ( 26 of 44)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 28 of 40)
48% ( 15 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
45% ( 34 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 29 of 66)
70
Total Points Won
71
7-6(4) 4-1 ret.
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 33 of 56)
1st Serve %
54% ( 34 of 63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 22 of 34)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
36% ( 20 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 28 of 63)
64
Total Points Won
55

Humbert VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Humbert Vs Zandschulp H2H Stats
Ugo Humbert Humbert Stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Zandschulp
5 H2H Matches 0
11 Sets Won 1
67 Games Won 42
13 Aces (Total) 28
12 Total Double Faults 22
1:41:5 Average Match Time 1:41:5
63% (213/337) 1st Serve % 59% (199/338)
74% (158/213) 1st Serve Win % 67% (134/199)
50% (62/124) 2nd Serve Win % 40% (56/139)
50% (21/42) Break Points Won % (Total) 50% (10/20)
44% (148/338) Return Points Win % 35% (117/337)
100% (4/4) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/4)
100% (1/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (2/2) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/2)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (5/5) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (5/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (5/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Ugo Humbert vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Humbert 5 - 0 Zandschulp

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Humbert has won 46.93% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 43.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Humbert, in recent form, has won 42.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 47.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.24% and 27.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Humbert has saved 59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Humbert has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 33/ 24), with Zandschulp winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Humbert has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 150/ 82), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 49/ 54). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
  • Player level: In the last year, Humbert has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Humbert winning 5 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Humbert winning 11 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Humbert and Zandschulp was at the Wimbledon - London, 03-07-2024, Second, Grass with Ugo Humbert getting the victory 7-6(9) 6-1 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:5.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Humbert and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Humbert winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Humbert winning 2, and Zandschulp 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Humbert has played against opponents with an average rank of 62.51 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 133.59.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Humbert has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Humbert has converted 32.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 33.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Ugo Humbert Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Fabian Marozsan
    Player
    Ugo Humbert
    59% ( 35 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 35 of 59)
    2
    Aces
    5
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 25 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 25 of 35)
    67% ( 16 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 11 of 24)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    31% ( 18 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 23 of 59)
    64
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Ugo Humbert
    Player
    Nicolas Jarry
    61% ( 45 of 74)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 61 of 104)
    4
    Aces
    13
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    82% ( 37 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 41 of 61)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 20 of 43)
    25% ( 4 of 16)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    30% ( 22 of 74)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 43 of 104)
    95
    Total Points Won
    83
    W
    4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alexei Popyrin
    Player
    Ugo Humbert
    64% ( 68 of 107)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 67 of 116)
    3
    Aces
    7
    6
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 52 of 68)
    1st Serve Won
    75% ( 50 of 67)
    49% ( 19 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    51% ( 25 of 49)
    11% ( 1 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    34% ( 36 of 107)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 41 of 116)
    112
    Total Points Won
    111
    L
    3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Joao Fonseca
    Player
    Ugo Humbert
    65% ( 26 of 40)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 33 of 53)
    5
    Aces
    5
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    96% ( 25 of 26)
    1st Serve Won
    79% ( 26 of 33)
    79% ( 11 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 6 of 20)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    10% ( 4 of 40)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 21 of 53)
    57
    Total Points Won
    36
    L
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R3
    cross
    Holger Rune
    Player
    Ugo Humbert
    51% ( 56 of 110)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 55 of 104)
    6
    Aces
    10
    9
    Double Faults
    5
    75% ( 42 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 39 of 55)
    52% ( 28 of 54)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 24 of 49)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    36% ( 40 of 110)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 41 of 104)
    111
    Total Points Won
    103
    L
    5-7 6-4 7-5 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Ugo Humbert
    Player
    Kei Nishikori
    50% ( 35 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 29 of 47)
    7
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    77% ( 27 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 17 of 29)
    49% ( 17 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    37% ( 26 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 22 of 47)
    66
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Tallon Griekspoor
    Player
    Ugo Humbert
    67% ( 62 of 93)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 43 of 76)
    13
    Aces
    8
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    76% ( 47 of 62)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 32 of 43)
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    14% ( 1 of 7)
    33% ( 31 of 93)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 27 of 76)
    89
    Total Points Won
    80
    L
    4-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Ugo Humbert
    Player
    Jiri Lehecka
    60% ( 29 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 36 of 55)
    6
    Aces
    1
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    83% ( 24 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 6 of 19)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    27% ( 13 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 30 of 55)
    65
    Total Points Won
    38
    W
    6-3 6-0 H2H
    F
    cross
    Ugo Humbert
    Player
    Hamad Medjedovic
    50% ( 33 of 66)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 44 of 72)
    13
    Aces
    4
    0
    Double Faults
    5
    82% ( 27 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    80% ( 35 of 44)
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 11 of 28)
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    26% ( 17 of 66)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 26 of 72)
    75
    Total Points Won
    63
    W
    7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Ugo Humbert
    Player
    Zizou Bergs
    58% ( 35 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    53% ( 31 of 58)
    5
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    83% ( 29 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 23 of 31)
    64% ( 16 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    25% ( 15 of 60)
    Rtn Points Won
    36% ( 21 of 58)
    66
    Total Points Won
    52
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H

    Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Ben Shelton
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    68% ( 40 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 40 of 68)
    3
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    83% ( 33 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 27 of 40)
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 14 of 28)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    25% ( 15 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 27 of 68)
    71
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    7-6(1) 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Roberto Bautista Agut
    72% ( 60 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 64 of 97)
    11
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 46 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 42 of 64)
    43% ( 10 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 19 of 33)
    18% ( 2 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    33% ( 27 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 36 of 97)
    92
    Total Points Won
    88
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Learner Tien
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    58% ( 29 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 26 of 54)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    76% ( 22 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 8 of 28)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    36% ( 18 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Max Hans Rehberg
    56% ( 25 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 24 of 46)
    3
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    84% ( 21 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 17 of 24)
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    24% ( 11 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 22 of 46)
    56
    Total Points Won
    35
    W
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Richard Gasquet
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    64% ( 63 of 98)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 55 of 93)
    2
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    65% ( 41 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 36 of 55)
    51% ( 18 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 15 of 38)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    40% ( 39 of 98)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 42 of 93)
    101
    Total Points Won
    90
    L
    4-6 7-5 6-1 H2H
    R3
    cross
    Francisco Cerundolo
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    54% ( 38 of 71)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 24 of 37)
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    37% ( 26 of 71)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 24 of 57)
    69
    Total Points Won
    59
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Novak Djokovic
    71% ( 58 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 49 of 73)
    4
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    60% ( 35 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    71% ( 17 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 7 of 24)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    37% ( 30 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 35 of 73)
    87
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    6-2 3-6 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Nick Kyrgios
    59% ( 35 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 34 of 59)
    2
    Aces
    6
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 25 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    36% ( 21 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 27 of 59)
    65
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    7-6(7) 3-0 ret. H2H
    QF
    cross
    Matteo Gigante
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    68% ( 40 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    39% ( 21 of 54)
    5
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    1
    75% ( 30 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    32% ( 6 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 14 of 33)
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    39% ( 23 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 29 of 54)
    65
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    7-5 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Lukas Klein
    51% ( 63 of 124)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 71 of 127)
    7
    Aces
    2
    7
    Double Faults
    8
    67% ( 42 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 39 of 71)
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 25 of 56)
    37% ( 7 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 5 of 20)
    44% ( 55 of 124)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 63 of 127)
    132
    Total Points Won
    119
    W
    5-7 6-3 6-3 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Humbert & Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Ugo Humbert Humbert Stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Zandschulp
    61% (356/226) Win/Loss 62% (362/226)
    59% (848/594) Sets Win/Loss 58% (824/589)
    53% (7510/6582) Games Win/Loss 53% (7081/6262)
    0.53 Aces Per Game 0.44
    3631 Aces Total 2872
    0.22 Double Faults Per Game 0.33
    1489 Total Double Faults 2134
    1st Match Average Match Time 1:35:30
    350.47 Average Opponent Rank 383.64
    61% (25527/42147) 1st Serve % 62% (23929/38869)
    74% (18842/25527) 1st Serve Win % 71% (17094/23929)
    53% (8735/16597) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (7201/14943)
    39% (1507/3908) Break Points Won % (Total) 43% (1770/4108)
    37% (15990/42713) Return Points Win % 41% (16289/40062)
    62% (328/525) Best of 3 Sets Win % 62% (335/537)
    45% (24/53) Best of 5 Sets Win % 53% (20/38)
    49% (128/262) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 55% (100/181)
    51% (101/197) Deciding Set Win % 58% (112/194)
    84% (352/294) 1st Set Won, Won Match 89% (341/302)
    16% (352/56) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 11% (341/38)
    26% (229/60) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 24% (245/59)

    Other Predictions

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...