B. Nakashima
To Win
TBD
To Win
Brandon Nakashima vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L L L
Form
W W W W W W W W L LHead-To-Head: Nakashima 3 - 0 Nava
They have played 7 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 6 and Nava winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Nava was at the Infosys Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 16-07-2024, First, Grass with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 3 |
| Emilio Nava | 0 |
Infosys Hall of Fame Open - Newport(16-07-2024)
7
5
6
2
| Nakashima | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (31-11) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 32 | Ranking | 132 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 124 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 61% (238-151) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-148) |
| $3,035,300 | Career Prize Money | $442,385 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Nakashima VS TBD
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Emilio Nava
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Emilio Nava
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 40 | Games Won | 22 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:59:21 | Average Match Time | 0:59:21 |
| 58% (71/123) | 1st Serve % | 68% (93/137) |
| 79% (56/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (53/93) |
| 62% (32/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 67% (8/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 45% (61/137) | Return Points Win % | 28% (35/123) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (238/151) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/148) |
| 59% (569/389) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (486/377) |
| 53% (5025/4409) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4365/4060) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (89/73) |
| 51% (31/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (100/47) |
| 69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 60% (24/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 2613 | Aces Total | 2139 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 667 | Total Double Faults | 1037 |
| 1:44:53 | Average Match Time | 1:36:39 |
| 178.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.54 |
| 64% (17964/28288) | 1st Serve % | 63% (15829/25307) |
| 75% (13387/17964) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11224/15829) |
| 54% (5589/10324) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4880/9478) |
| 38% (939/2479) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (941/2254) |
| 37% (10915/29442) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9600/25372) |
| 49% (19/20) | Slam W/L | 55% (12/10) |
| 48% (27/29) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (80/56) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (92/40) | Challenger W/L | 62% (142/88) |
| 74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 61% (212/346) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (214/358) |
| 57% (23/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 55% (118/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/157) |
| 50% (61/122) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (74/121) |
| 86% (240/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (204/176) |
| 14% (240/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (204/28) |
| 20% (148/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (163/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
