A. Zverev
To Win
TBD
To Win
Alexander Zverev vs Jacob Fearnley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W W W
Form
L W W W L W L W L WHead-2-Head: Zverev 2 - 0 Fearnley
They have played 5 sets in total, with Zverev winning 5 and Fearnley winning 0. The last match between Zverev and Fearnley was at the Miami Open - Miami, 22-03-2025, Second, Hard with Alexander Zverev getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 2 |
| Jacob Fearnley | 0 |
Miami Open - Miami(22-03-2025)
6
2
6
4
| Zverev | Stats | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (19-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (15-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 2 | Ranking | 68 |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 68 |
| 28 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 27 | Titles | 6 |
| 68% (565-267) | Career Total W/L | 76% (88-28) |
| $31,973,084 | Career Prize Money | $484,190 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Zverev VS TBD
- / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 30 | Games Won | 17 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:38:24 | Average Match Time | 1:38:24 |
| 78% (102/130) | 1st Serve % | 67% (92/138) |
| 80% (82/102) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (55/92) |
| 50% (14/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (23/46) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 43% (60/138) | Return Points Win % | 26% (34/130) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alexander Zverev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Ben Shelton
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Fabian Marozsan
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
68%
(
79 of
116)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
44 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Daniel Altmaier
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Alexandre Muller
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Alexander Zverev
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Alexander Zverev
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jordan Thompson
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
6
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Alexander Zverev
67%
(
90 of
135)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
10
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
121
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Pavel Kotov
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (565/267) | Win/Loss | 76% (88/28) |
| 64% (1384/784) | Sets Win/Loss | 69% (187/84) |
| 54% (11463/9829) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (1422/1082) |
| 67% (223/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (29/11) |
| 70% (202/86) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 67% (101/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (46/10) |
| 66% (39/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) |
| 0.6 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 6313 | Aces Total | 541 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2845 | Total Double Faults | 460 |
| 1:47:41 | Average Match Time | 1:24:47 |
| 321.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 243.78 |
| 66% (40206/61094) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4353/7149) |
| 74% (29873/40206) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (3195/4353) |
| 51% (10571/20880) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1427/2796) |
| 41% (2463/6044) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (358/802) |
| 38% (24542/63784) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3105/7475) |
| 74% (112/39) | Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 69% (150/66) | Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 57% (26/20) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 68% (196/91) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 63% (17/10) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (34/23) | Challenger W/L | 82% (37/8) |
| 55% (21/17) | Futures W/L | 82% (36/8) |
| 67% (449/673) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 77% (85/110) |
| 73% (111/152) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 59% (218/368) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (19/28) |
| 58% (162/280) | Deciding Set Win % | 79% (26/33) |
| 86% (547/471) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (73/70) |
| 14% (547/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (73/3) |
| 33% (285/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 42% (43/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
