T. Griekspoor
To Win
V. Kopriva
To Win
Vit Kopriva vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W W
Form
W L W L W W L W W WHead-To-Head: Kopriva 2 - 0 Cerundolo
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kopriva winning 4 and Cerundolo winning 1. The last match between Kopriva and Cerundolo was at the Lima 2 Challenger, 09-11-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Vit Kopriva getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vit Kopriva | 2 |
| Juan Manuel Cerundolo | 0 |
Lima 2 Challenger(09-11-2024)
3
6
6
4
6
2
| Kopriva | Stats | Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (19-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (20-12) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 95 | Ranking | 126 |
| 95 | Highest Rank | 79 |
| 27 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 11 | Titles | 14 |
| 60% (387-260) | Career Total W/L | 62% (267-165) |
| $510,660 | Career Prize Money | $436,505 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:44:53 | Average Match Time | 1:44:53 |
| 60% (80/133) | 1st Serve % | 65% (84/130) |
| 69% (55/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (45/84) |
| 49% (26/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 85% (11/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 48% (63/130) | Return Points Win % | 39% (52/133) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Valentin Royer
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Vit Kopriva
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Borna Gojo
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Luciano Darderi
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Calvin Hemery
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Raphael Collignon
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
43%
(
36 of
83)
5
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Max Houkes
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Joao Graca
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Murkel Dellien
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Titouan Droguet
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (387/260) | Win/Loss | 62% (267/165) |
| 57% (856/655) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (594/409) |
| 53% (7348/6535) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4882/4347) |
| 60% (87/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) |
| 61% (273/174) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (258/142) |
| 47% (23/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 57% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1616 | Aces Total | 654 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1667 | Total Double Faults | 959 |
| 1:39:43 | Average Match Time | 1:39:20 |
| 242.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.04 |
| 60% (25236/41990) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19038/28421) |
| 65% (16522/25236) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11942/19038) |
| 49% (8279/16753) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4680/9382) |
| 47% (2297/4878) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1525/3256) |
| 43% (18501/42690) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12479/28805) |
| 43% (10/13) | Slam W/L | 35% (6/11) |
| 54% (7/6) | Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (22/15) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (34/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (157/118) | Challenger W/L | 65% (145/79) |
| 64% (190/107) | Futures W/L | 65% (74/39) |
| 60% (378/634) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (262/410) |
| 75% (6/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (3/17) |
| 53% (79/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (73/109) |
| 61% (130/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (75/124) |
| 88% (350/308) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (258/226) |
| 12% (350/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (258/31) |
| 27% (296/79) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (174/41) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
