Tereza Smitkova vs Elizabeth Halbauer Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L W W L
Form
L L W L L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Smitkova 2 - 0 Halbauer
They have played 5 sets in total, with Smitkova winning 4 and Halbauer winning 1. The last match between Smitkova and Halbauer was at the W25 Aschaffenburg, 13-07-2022, First, Clay with Tereza Smitkova getting the victory 6-3 2-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tereza Smitkova | 2 |
| Elizabeth Halbauer | 0 |
W25 Aschaffenburg(13-07-2022)
6
3
2
6
7
5
| Smitkova | Stats | Halbauer |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 863 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 57 | Highest Rank | 260 |
| 30 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 59% (350-245) | Career Total W/L | 57% (207-159) |
| $492,762 | Career Prize Money | $1,225 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
78%
(
72 of
92)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 20 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:0:1 | Average Match Time | 2:0:1 |
| 64% (110/172) | 1st Serve % | 74% (115/155) |
| 58% (64/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (58/115) |
| 53% (33/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 60% (12/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (8/26) |
| 50% (77/155) | Return Points Win % | 44% (75/172) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tereza Smitkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tereza Smitkova
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Ivana Sebestova
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Gabriela Nanova
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Tereza Smitkova
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Ivana Sebestova
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Tereza Smitkova
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Tereza Smitkova
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Valeriya Olyanovskaya
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Halbauer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Barbora Michalkova
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
-
Aces
-
13
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
73%
(
11 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Julia Avdeeva
68%
(
78 of
115)
1st Serve %
52%
(
62 of
119)
0
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
118)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
38 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Elizabeth Halbauer
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
78%
(
72 of
92)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (350/245) | Win/Loss | 57% (207/159) |
| 57% (777/583) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (474/365) |
| 53% (6621/5784) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4049/3590) |
| 49% (38/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (48/54) |
| 53% (124/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (153/98) |
| 69% (165/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 52% (23/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1787 | Aces Total | 90 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1330 | Total Double Faults | 849 |
| 1:1:58 | Average Match Time | 1:10:51 |
| 530.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 542.88 |
| 60% (16746/28043) | 1st Serve % | 70% (11608/16585) |
| 66% (11088/16746) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (6529/11608) |
| 46% (5194/11298) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2154/4977) |
| 45% (1449/3192) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1165/2295) |
| 43% (12017/27706) | Return Points Win % | 49% (8087/16525) |
| 47% (22/25) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (46/51) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (228/149) | Challenger W/L | 53% (154/136) |
| 78% (49/14) | Futures W/L | 78% (53/15) |
| 59% (346/583) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (205/358) |
| 0% (0/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (62/120) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (32/65) |
| 56% (96/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (52/112) |
| 87% (356/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (203/174) |
| 12% (356/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (203/29) |
| 16% (239/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (162/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
