MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Taro Daniel [123rd] vs Max Purcell [138th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Daniel 3 - 0 Purcell

They have played 6 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Purcell was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 10-01-2024, Second, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Taro Daniel 3
Max Purcell 0
Daniel vs Purcell H2H Profile
Daniel Stats Purcell
27% (4-11) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
3 Head-to-Head 0
123 Ranking 138
58 Highest Rank 40
32 Age 27
R Plays R
14 Titles 9
58% (573-421) Career Total W/L 57% (287-215)
$2,262,594 Career Prize Money $1,208,460
3 Hard H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Daniel VS Purcell H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-4
cross
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
69% ( 33 of 48)
1st Serve %
65% ( 39 of 60)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
91% ( 30 of 33)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
19% ( 9 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 24 of 60)
63
Total Points Won
45
6-2 6-2
cross
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
54% ( 28 of 52)
1st Serve %
52% ( 22 of 42)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
82% ( 23 of 28)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 13 of 22)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
58
Total Points Won
36
6-3 4-3 ret.
cross
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
42% ( 16 of 38)
1st Serve %
60% ( 31 of 52)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88% ( 14 of 16)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 23 of 31)
73% ( 16 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 6 of 21)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
21% ( 8 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 23 of 52)
53
Total Points Won
37

Daniel VS Purcell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Daniel Vs Purcell H2H Stats
Taro Daniel Daniel Stats Max Purcell Purcell
3 H2H Matches 0
6 Sets Won 0
34 Games Won 16
19 Aces (Total) 8
1 Total Double Faults 1
1:9:3 Average Match Time 1:9:3
56% (77/138) 1st Serve % 60% (92/154)
87% (67/77) 1st Serve Win % 65% (60/92)
64% (39/61) 2nd Serve Win % 42% (26/62)
91% (10/11) Break Points Won % (Total) 14% (1/7)
44% (68/154) Return Points Win % 23% (32/138)
100% (3/3) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/3)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (3/3) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (3/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (3/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Taro Daniel vs Max Purcell Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Daniel 3 - 0 Purcell

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 43% of points on their second serve, while Purcell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 40.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Purcell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 57.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purcell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 44.07% of matches played (W/L 26/ 33), with Purcell winning 53.33% (W/L 16/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 209/ 147), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
  • Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 16/ 8), where as Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Daniel winning 3 times and Purcell being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Purcell was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 10-01-2024, Second, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:3.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Purcell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daniel winning 0 times and Purcell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 0, and Purcell 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.2 while Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 138.07.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purcell has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 25.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purcell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jenson Brooksby
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    57% ( 30 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 36 of 66)
    4
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 23 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 24 of 36)
    78% ( 18 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 16 of 30)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 12 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 26 of 66)
    67
    Total Points Won
    52
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Darwin Blanch
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    61% ( 51 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 55 of 83)
    8
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    84% ( 43 of 51)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 34 of 55)
    53% ( 17 of 32)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 12 of 28)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    28% ( 23 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 37 of 83)
    97
    Total Points Won
    69
    L
    6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Nikoloz Basilashvili
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 23 of 41)
    11
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    81% ( 26 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 16 of 23)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 8 of 18)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    24% ( 12 of 51)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 17 of 41)
    56
    Total Points Won
    36
    L
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Taro Daniel
    Player
    Mathis Bondaz
    53% ( 25 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 32 of 49)
    4
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    6
    76% ( 19 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 16 of 32)
    73% ( 16 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 6 of 17)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    26% ( 12 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 27 of 49)
    62
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Radu Albot
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    70% ( 54 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 56 of 104)
    9
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    74% ( 40 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 38 of 56)
    52% ( 12 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 19 of 48)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    32% ( 25 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 47 of 104)
    99
    Total Points Won
    82
    L
    3-6 6-2 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Eliot Spizzirri
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    65% ( 54 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 57 of 104)
    6
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    78% ( 42 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 32 of 57)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 26 of 47)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 26 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 46 of 104)
    103
    Total Points Won
    84
    L
    6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Taro Daniel
    Player
    Alex Rybakov
    56% ( 58 of 103)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 54 of 87)
    2
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    78% ( 45 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 41 of 54)
    58% ( 26 of 45)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 17 of 33)
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    8% ( 1 of 13)
    31% ( 32 of 103)
    Rtn Points Won
    33% ( 29 of 87)
    100
    Total Points Won
    90
    W
    7-6(9) 7-6(1) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Taro Daniel
    Player
    Tyler Zink
    62% ( 33 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 63)
    5
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    85% ( 28 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 16 of 28)
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    23% ( 12 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 24 of 63)
    65
    Total Points Won
    51
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    70% ( 46 of 66)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 41 of 58)
    8
    Aces
    2
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 34 of 46)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 28 of 41)
    50% ( 10 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 4 of 17)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    33% ( 22 of 66)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 26 of 58)
    70
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    6-2 7-6(2) H2H
    QF
    cross
    James Kent Trotter
    Player
    Taro Daniel
    61% ( 53 of 87)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 89 of 128)
    10
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    0
    77% ( 41 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 54 of 89)
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    56% ( 22 of 39)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    26% ( 23 of 87)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 52 of 128)
    116
    Total Points Won
    99
    L
    6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 H2H

    Max Purcell Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Tommy Paul
    Player
    Max Purcell
    60% ( 28 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 35 of 67)
    5
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    86% ( 24 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 22 of 35)
    74% ( 14 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 14 of 32)
    36% ( 5 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    19% ( 9 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 31 of 67)
    69
    Total Points Won
    45
    L
    7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. H2H
    R1
    cross
    Max Purcell
    Player
    Aleksandar Vukic
    50% ( 53 of 107)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 48 of 93)
    9
    Aces
    15
    4
    Double Faults
    5
    74% ( 39 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    61% ( 33 of 54)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 22 of 45)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    33% ( 35 of 107)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 39 of 93)
    111
    Total Points Won
    89
    W
    7-5 6-4 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Pablo Carreno-Busta
    Player
    Max Purcell
    63% ( 27 of 43)
    1st Serve %
    47% ( 21 of 45)
    11
    Aces
    4
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    85% ( 23 of 27)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 15 of 21)
    81% ( 13 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    16% ( 7 of 43)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 17 of 45)
    53
    Total Points Won
    35
    L
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Max Purcell
    Player
    Tomas Machac
    48% ( 31 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 51 of 80)
    15
    Aces
    6
    3
    Double Faults
    5
    94% ( 29 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 33 of 51)
    59% ( 20 of 34)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 14 of 29)
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    25% ( 16 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 33 of 80)
    82
    Total Points Won
    63
    W
    6-4 7-6(1) H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Arthur Cazaux
    Player
    Max Purcell
    57% ( 64 of 113)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 55 of 100)
    7
    Aces
    7
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    66% ( 42 of 64)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 39 of 55)
    67% ( 33 of 49)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 27 of 45)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    34% ( 38 of 113)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 34 of 100)
    109
    Total Points Won
    104
    L
    4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Thanasi Kokkinakis
    Player
    Max Purcell
    59% ( 43 of 73)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 56 of 104)
    15
    Aces
    11
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    93% ( 40 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    84% ( 47 of 56)
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 21 of 48)
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    12% ( 9 of 73)
    Rtn Points Won
    35% ( 36 of 104)
    100
    Total Points Won
    77
    L
    6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Juncheng Shang
    Player
    Max Purcell
    60% ( 45 of 75)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 41 of 79)
    4
    Aces
    12
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    73% ( 33 of 45)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 32 of 41)
    60% ( 18 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 17 of 38)
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    32% ( 24 of 75)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 30 of 79)
    81
    Total Points Won
    73
    L
    7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Max Purcell
    Player
    David Goffin
    62% ( 29 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    77% ( 36 of 47)
    8
    Aces
    4
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    83% ( 24 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 24 of 36)
    67% ( 12 of 18)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 11 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 19 of 47)
    55
    Total Points Won
    39
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Max Purcell
    Player
    Christopher O'Connell
    59% ( 48 of 81)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 54 of 91)
    17
    Aces
    7
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    83% ( 40 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 36 of 54)
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 21 of 37)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    26% ( 21 of 81)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 34 of 91)
    94
    Total Points Won
    78
    W
    4-6 7-5 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Otto Virtanen
    Player
    Max Purcell
    68% ( 54 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 50 of 77)
    19
    Aces
    4
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    80% ( 43 of 54)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 35 of 50)
    56% ( 14 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 9 of 27)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 6)
    28% ( 22 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 33 of 77)
    90
    Total Points Won
    66
    L
    6-3 6-2 6-2 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Daniel & Purcell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Taro Daniel Daniel Stats Max Purcell Purcell
    58% (573/421) Win/Loss 57% (287/215)
    56% (1316/1033) Sets Win/Loss 55% (648/539)
    52% (11470/10587) Games Win/Loss 51% (5863/5606)
    0.23 Aces Per Game 0.56
    2467 Aces Total 3164
    0.19 Double Faults Per Game 0.18
    1994 Total Double Faults 1013
    1st Match Average Match Time 1:33:52
    483.85 Average Opponent Rank 440.76
    63% (35491/56755) 1st Serve % 59% (20309/34498)
    68% (24080/35491) 1st Serve Win % 72% (14718/20309)
    51% (10829/21255) 2nd Serve Win % 51% (7170/14188)
    43% (2402/5588) Break Points Won % (Total) 40% (1272/3220)
    39% (21978/55972) Return Points Win % 38% (13496/35605)
    59% (549/934) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (278/480)
    27% (13/49) Best of 5 Sets Win % 31% (5/16)
    53% (162/307) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 56% (112/200)
    50% (148/297) Deciding Set Win % 59% (96/164)
    84% (590/498) 1st Set Won, Won Match 86% (270/233)
    15% (590/91) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 14% (270/37)
    18% (404/72) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 23% (231/53)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...