Prediction of Shintaro Mochizuki [153rd] vs Yannick Hanfmann [131st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L W L
Form
L W L W L L L L W LHead To Head: Mochizuki 1 - 1 Hanfmann
They have played 4 sets in total, with Mochizuki winning 2 and Hanfmann winning 2. The last match between Mochizuki and Hanfmann was at the Miami Open - Miami, 18-03-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Shintaro Mochizuki getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shintaro Mochizuki | 1 |
| Yannick Hanfmann | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 23 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:43:31 | Average Match Time | 1:43:31 |
| 62% (91/147) | 1st Serve % | 73% (110/150) |
| 73% (66/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (73/110) |
| 55% (31/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 36% (54/150) | Return Points Win % | 34% (50/147) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Yannick Hanfmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 1 Hanfmann
Editorial Prediction:
In the past six months, the second serve performance favors Hanfmann slightly, winning 45.49% of points compared to Mochizuki's 43.58%. This statistic has been strongly correlated with match outcomes, suggesting a marginal advantage for Hanfmann in upcoming contests. Meanwhile, return game stats reveal Mochizuki as the superior player in dealing with opponents' second serves, winning 46.87% of the points, while Hanfmann has managed 39.47%. Additionally, Mochizuki leads in first serve returns with 29.31% against Hanfmann's 23.93%, which is also indicative of who might be favored in their head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Hanfmann displays a more resilient performance, saving 58.9% of breakpoints compared to Mochizuki's 52.41%. Such a measure is often useful in making in-game predictions when the match dynamics are tense. Overall, a performance overview from the last year shows Mochizuki winning 53.62% of his matches (W/L 37/32), surpassing Hanfmann, who won 46.3% (W/L 25/29). This provides a comprehensive outlook for their upcoming match.
Analyzing their preferences by surface, both players exhibit their best performance on clay. Mochizuki secures 60% of matches (W/L 59/39) on this surface, while Hanfmann boasts a slightly higher 63% (W/L 212/126). Their weakest performance is observed on grass, with Mochizuki winning just 41%, while Hanfmann maintains a slightly better 46% win rate. Therefore, surface knowledge might serve as a strategic input for evaluating their prospects.
Examining their level of play, Mochizuki primarily competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, achieving a win rate of 58.33% (W/L 28/20), as opposed to Hanfmann who mainly partakes in the Main tour, maintaining a 50% win rate (W/L 16/16). When comparing player statistics, it's essential to contextualize within the event level each athlete contends.
The direct head-to-head record between Mochizuki and Hanfmann narrates a story of dominant outings by the latter. In their only confrontation, Hanfmann emerged victorious, winning both sets with scores of 6-4 and 7-6(4) at the Chengdu Open on hard court. The match, enduring 1 hour, 46 minutes, displayed Hanfmann's superiority against Mochizuki in critical moments, including outplaying him in the tiebreak. It's notable that neither has claimed a deciding set in their confrontations.
In deciding sets against all competitors, Hanfmann holds a commendable edge, triumphing in 71% of such scenarios over the last year compared to Mochizuki's 60%. This stat could sway predictions if their encounter reaches a decisive set. When judging based on the average ranking of past opponents, Hanfmann's previous adversaries had a stronger caliber, bearing a mean rank of 125.8 against Mochizuki's 281.72. Lastly, in terms of break point conversion, Mochizuki capitalizes more on opportunities, succeeding in 38.65% of them, while Hanfmann follows closely with a 34.29% rate.
Such comprehensive statistical insights point towards Hanfmann as the likely winner in their upcoming match, given his demonstrated durability, superior head-to-head record, and the strength of opposition faced. Therefore, Hanfmann appears to provide a strategic advantage in this anticipated tennis clash.
Shintaro Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
53%
(
54 of
102)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
108)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
James McCabe
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
1
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
36%
(
18 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Jay Clarke
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
73 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
94)
8
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
87 of
138)
9
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
60 of
138)
133
Total Points Won
121
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (191/161) | Win/Loss | 58% (360/266) |
| 52% (434/396) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (814/663) |
| 50% (3938/3919) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7392/6710) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 716 | Aces Total | 2561 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1482 | Total Double Faults | 1224 |
| 1:42:1 | Average Match Time | 1:24:23 |
| 409.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.12 |
| 57% (14032/24757) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24301/38037) |
| 66% (9193/14032) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17010/24301) |
| 47% (5006/10725) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7202/13736) |
| 44% (1234/2795) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1511/3790) |
| 43% (10674/25073) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15459/39761) |
| 54% (183/340) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (352/600) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 16% (3/19) |
| 59% (61/104) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (90/204) |
| 56% (71/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (115/204) |
| 84% (178/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (360/303) |
| 16% (178/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (360/56) |
| 23% (174/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (266/56) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
