Ruben Bemelmans vs Michael Shaw Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L L L L
Form
W L L W W W W L W LH2H: Bemelmans 1 - 0 Shaw
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 2 and Shaw winning 0. The last match between Bemelmans and Shaw was at the M25 Nottingham, 12-04-2022, First, Hard with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ruben Bemelmans | 1 |
| Michael Shaw | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats 
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:15:0 | Average Match Time | 2:15:0 |
| 64% (47/73) | 1st Serve % | 63% (50/79) |
| 77% (36/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (40/50) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (10/29) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 37% (29/79) | Return Points Win % | 29% (21/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Shaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tom Hands
Player
Michael Shaw
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
12
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
William Mclennaghan
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Michael Shaw
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Jan Hrazdil
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
11
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Yujiro Onuma
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Lazar Vojinovic
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Kroslak
Player
Michael Shaw
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Akram El Sallaly
Player
Michael Shaw
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Jan Hrazdil
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (552/419) | Win/Loss | 51% (103/99) |
| 55% (1294/1046) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (228/225) |
| 52% (12026/11063) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2242/2210) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 4063 | Aces Total | 442 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1912 | Total Double Faults | 247 |
| 1:5:15 | Average Match Time | 1:1:6 |
| 579.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 257.31 |
| 63% (32697/51842) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5362/8332) |
| 73% (23728/32697) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3715/5362) |
| 52% (9987/19146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1447/2970) |
| 40% (1787/4501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (269/659) |
| 37% (19613/52826) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3017/8143) |
| 57% (526/916) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (102/201) |
| 43% (19/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (208/420) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (25/50) |
| 50% (173/347) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (27/50) |
| 84% (542/456) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (110/96) |
| 15% (542/84) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (110/14) |
| 21% (428/92) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (92/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
