A. Kachmazov
To Win
R. Noguchi
To Win
Rio Noguchi vs Mats Rosenkranz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L L W W W
Form
L W L W W L W W L LH2H: Noguchi 2 - 0 Rosenkranz
They have played 4 sets in total, with Noguchi winning 4 and Rosenkranz winning 0. The last match between Noguchi and Rosenkranz was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Rio Noguchi getting the victory 6-4 7-6(9).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rio Noguchi | 2 |
| Mats Rosenkranz | 0 |
Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
6
4
7
6
| Noguchi | Stats | Rosenkranz |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (17-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (16-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 254 | Ranking | 365 |
| 201 | Highest Rank | 336 |
| 26 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 9 | Titles | 8 |
| 59% (345-237) | Career Total W/L | 51% (299-283) |
| $132,865 | Career Prize Money | $4,755 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noguchi VS Rosenkranz H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(9) |
Stats 
Rio Noguchi
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
78%
(
70 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
66)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Noguchi VS Rosenkranz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 17 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:38:12 | Average Match Time | 1:38:12 |
| 74% (109/148) | 1st Serve % | 57% (78/136) |
| 73% (80/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (57/78) |
| 46% (18/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 15% (2/13) |
| 38% (52/136) | Return Points Win % | 34% (50/148) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rio Noguchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Kasidit Samrej
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
78%
(
70 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Rio Noguchi
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Lingxi Zhao
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Akira Santillan
Player
Rio Noguchi
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Nino Ehrenschneider
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Niels Visker
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
64 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
38%
(
20 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Mats Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
78%
(
70 of
90)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Moerani Bouzige
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
10
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Fajing Sun
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve %
79%
(
11 of
14)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
12
Total Points Won
13
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
James Story
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
54%
(
57 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
83 of
129)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
129)
118
Total Points Won
117
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Arthur Reymond
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
16 of
19)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
39
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
87 of
128)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
0
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
62 of
87)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
31 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (345/237) | Win/Loss | 51% (299/283) |
| 57% (739/552) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (676/670) |
| 53% (6296/5517) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6647/6483) |
| 62% (240/149) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (56/71) |
| 51% (65/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (107/110) |
| 58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (127/96) |
| 64% (21/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.59 |
| 607 | Aces Total | 3756 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 844 | Total Double Faults | 1861 |
| 1:17:8 | Average Match Time | 1:23:57 |
| 443.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.6 |
| 66% (20457/30883) | 1st Serve % | 60% (20545/34163) |
| 65% (13350/20457) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (15309/20545) |
| 50% (5227/10426) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6528/13618) |
| 45% (1522/3370) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1116/2913) |
| 42% (13308/31831) | Return Points Win % | 37% (12783/34766) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/4) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (78/88) | Challenger W/L | 46% (69/81) |
| 65% (260/142) | Futures W/L | 54% (229/197) |
| 59% (339/576) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (292/572) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (64/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (110/220) |
| 58% (75/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (105/189) |
| 92% (315/290) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (291/245) |
| 8% (315/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (291/46) |
| 20% (266/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (290/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
