Prediction of Rafael Jodar [686th] vs Rudy Quan [666th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L W W L W
Form
W L W W W L L L W LHead-To-Head: Jodar 0 - 0 Quan
| Jodar | Stats | Quan |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (3-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 686 | Ranking | 666 |
| 686 | Highest Rank | 666 |
| 18 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (11-10) | Career Total W/L | 59% (32-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $14,730 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rafael Jodar vs Rudy Quan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jodar 0 - 0 Quan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jodar has won 45.45% of points on their second serve, while Quan has won 42.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jodar, in recent form, has won 50.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quan has won 53.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.25% and 26.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jodar has saved 54.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quan has saved 53.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jodar has won 69.23% of matches played (W/L 9/ 4), with Quan winning 60.87% (W/L 14/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jodar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Quan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jodar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 6/ 2), where as Quan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jodar has played against opponents with an average rank of 333.54 while Quan has played against players with an average rank of 323.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jodar has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quan has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jodar has converted 32.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quan has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Rafael Jodar vs Rudy Quan Best Odds For The Match
Rafael Jodar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Rafael Jodar
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
12
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Rafael Jodar
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Stefan Kozlov
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
98)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Rafael Jodar
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 2-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Rudy Quan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Rudy Quan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Rudy Quan
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Rudy Quan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Rudy Quan
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Guy Den Ouden
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Keegan Smith
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Patrick Zahraj
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Jodar vs Quan?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Jodar Vs Quan is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (11/10) | Win/Loss | 59% (32/22) |
| 50% (25/25) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (70/56) |
| 49% (232/243) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (628/589) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 45 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 48 | Total Double Faults | 117 |
| 1:35:6 | Average Match Time | 1:9:21 |
| 335 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.28 |
| 58% (785/1355) | 1st Serve % | 70% (1663/2384) |
| 65% (513/785) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (967/1663) |
| 47% (266/570) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (315/721) |
| 43% (59/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (148/299) |
| 41% (529/1288) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1078/2322) |
| 52% (11/21) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (32/54) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (7/10) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 82% (11/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (28/26) |
| 18% (11/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (28/2) |
| 20% (10/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (26/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
