Radu Mihai Papoe vs Darian King Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L L
Form
L L L W W W L L W WH2H: Papoe 1 - 0 King
They have played 3 sets in total, with Papoe winning 2 and King winning 1. The last match between Papoe and King was at the M15 Ithaca, 22-01-2023, Final, I.hard with Radu Mihai Papoe getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Radu Mihai Papoe | 1 |
| Darian King | 0 |
M15 Ithaca(22-01-2023)
1
6
6
4
6
2
| Papoe | Stats | King |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (3-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 630 | Ranking | 766 |
| 509 | Highest Rank | 106 |
| 22 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 18 |
| 68% (117-55) | Career Total W/L | 63% (408-243) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $203,380 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Darian King
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
79%
(
57 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:57:0 | Average Match Time | 1:57:0 |
| 70% (61/87) | 1st Serve % | 79% (57/72) |
| 57% (35/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (34/57) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 44% (32/72) | Return Points Win % | 41% (36/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bryce Nakashima
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Wally Thayne
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Aidan Mchugh
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Aidan Kim
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Francesco Ferrari
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Giannicola Misasi
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Darian King Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael De Alba
Player
Darian King
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Darian King
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Enmanuel Munoz
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
34 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Darian King
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Darian King
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Darian King
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (117/55) | Win/Loss | 63% (408/243) |
| 65% (248/134) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (905/616) |
| 57% (1942/1446) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7539/6491) |
| 71% (5/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (287/154) |
| 68% (86/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (90/54) |
| 67% (26/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 118 | Aces Total | 759 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 159 | Total Double Faults | 846 |
| 1:14:20 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 388.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 554.5 |
| 69% (5449/7946) | 1st Serve % | 66% (18153/27338) |
| 63% (3425/5449) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11723/18153) |
| 53% (1333/2497) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4700/9183) |
| 49% (487/995) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1346/3086) |
| 46% (3669/8049) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11833/28123) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 45% (14/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (7/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 74% (28/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 60% (9/6) | Challenger W/L | 54% (120/101) |
| 69% (108/49) | Futures W/L | 71% (226/91) |
| 68% (116/171) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (382/614) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 70% (21/30) |
| 61% (17/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (85/152) |
| 62% (23/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (119/190) |
| 93% (107/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (362/331) |
| 7% (107/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (362/31) |
| 26% (65/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (289/74) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
