Qian Sun vs Sanhui Shin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Sun 0 - 0 Shin
| Sun | Stats | Shin |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 581 |
| Highest Rank | 456 | |
| 23 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 49% (62-64) | Career Total W/L | 63% (141-84) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Qian Sun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 0-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 0-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Sanhui Shin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Egor Agafonov
Player
Sanhui Shin
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Filip Peliwo
39%
(
34 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Sanhui Shin
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Johannus Monday
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Yan Bai
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryo Tabata
Player
Sanhui Shin
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
0-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (62/64) | Win/Loss | 63% (141/84) |
| 52% (147/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (312/199) |
| 52% (1366/1283) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2572/2123) |
| 54% (62/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (108/67) |
| 0% (0/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 72% (26/10) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 303 | Aces Total | 405 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 250 | Total Double Faults | 376 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:25:15 |
| 313.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.35 |
| 60% (2203/3685) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8050/12368) |
| 68% (1500/2203) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (5327/8050) |
| 44% (649/1482) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2162/4318) |
| 44% (145/329) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (647/1326) |
| 38% (1389/3654) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5237/12219) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Challenger W/L | 37% (10/17) |
| 50% (60/60) | Futures W/L | 66% (131/66) |
| 50% (62/124) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (137/216) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 36% (9/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (27/56) |
| 29% (9/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (33/64) |
| 83% (69/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (141/120) |
| 17% (69/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (141/18) |
| 9% (57/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (84/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
