Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos vs Dillon Beckles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W L L
Form
W L W L L L L W L LHead-To-Head: Santos 1 - 0 Beckles
They have played 2 sets in total, with Santos winning 2 and Beckles winning 0. The last match between Santos and Beckles was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, Clay with Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos | 1 |
| Dillon Beckles | 0 |
Brazzaville Challenger(18-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Comesana VS Fils PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Dillon Beckles
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:58:12 | Average Match Time | 0:58:12 |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve % | 64% (32/50) |
| 78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 52% (26/50) | Return Points Win % | 29% (12/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
112)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Lucca Pinto
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Seita Watanabe
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Alexander Baez
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
66%
(
72 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Leonardo Aboian
52%
(
56 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Dillon Beckles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Paulo Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Dillon Beckles
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dillon Beckles
Player
Cheik Pandzou Ekoume
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Dillon Beckles
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryoto Tachi
Player
Dillon Beckles
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 2-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Dillon Beckles
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dillon Beckles
Player
Shourya Manik
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48% (100/110) | Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 48% (234/258) | Sets Win/Loss | 38% (9/15) |
| 49% (2408/2460) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (101/118) |
| 44% (20/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 49% (80/84) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 492 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 518 | Total Double Faults | 25 |
| 1:29:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 313.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 199.45 |
| 61% (6625/10910) | 1st Serve % | 64% (261/408) |
| 66% (4347/6625) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (152/261) |
| 46% (1964/4284) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (67/147) |
| 44% (417/949) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (22/41) |
| 39% (4120/10574) | Return Points Win % | 43% (179/412) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (12/25) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 51% (88/85) | Futures W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 47% (99/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (31/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (37/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 78% (101/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 22% (101/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 18% (109/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
