P. Maloney
To Win
A. Mayo
To Win
Patrick Maloney vs Corentin Denolly Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W W
Form
L W W W L W L L W LHead To Head: Maloney 1 - 1 Denolly
They have played 5 sets in total, with Maloney winning 2 and Denolly winning 3. The last match between Maloney and Denolly was at the Sarasota Challenger, 07-04-2025, Q3, Clay with Patrick Maloney getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Maloney | 1 |
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
Sarasota Challenger(07-04-2025)
6
3
3
6
6
1
| Maloney | Stats | Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (23-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (10-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 349 | Ranking | 283 |
| 349 | Highest Rank | 269 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 3 | Titles | 12 |
| 66% (92-48) | Career Total W/L | 63% (412-244) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $56,935 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cirstea VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Patrick Maloney
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 18 | Games Won | 22 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:31:24 | Average Match Time | 1:31:24 |
| 64% (76/119) | 1st Serve % | 63% (77/122) |
| 53% (40/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (47/77) |
| 51% (22/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (19/45) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (10/14) |
| 46% (56/122) | Return Points Win % | 48% (57/119) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Maloney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Alex Rybakov
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Patrick Maloney
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jenson Brooksby
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
9
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Martin Damm
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Sebastian Gima
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Andres Andrade
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (92/48) | Win/Loss | 63% (412/244) |
| 62% (201/124) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (899/597) |
| 54% (1658/1402) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7517/6429) |
| 61% (28/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (61/48) |
| 67% (29/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (293/149) |
| 69% (35/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (58/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 560 | Aces Total | 1995 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 365 | Total Double Faults | 1880 |
| 1:34:52 | Average Match Time | 1:26:42 |
| 393.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 499.58 |
| 65% (5556/8599) | 1st Serve % | 65% (26358/40557) |
| 69% (3855/5556) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (17769/26358) |
| 49% (1483/3043) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (6917/14200) |
| 43% (382/885) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2077/4609) |
| 41% (3543/8691) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17548/41198) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (22/17) | Challenger W/L | 44% (52/65) |
| 70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 67% (355/175) |
| 65% (90/138) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (409/647) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (101/179) |
| 60% (28/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (114/191) |
| 83% (96/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (397/358) |
| 17% (96/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (397/39) |
| 25% (44/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (259/54) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
