Nao Hibino vs Alina Charaeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W W L L
Form
W L W W W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Hibino 0 - 0 Charaeva
| Hibino | Stats | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (11-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (10-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 202 | Ranking | 255 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 197 |
| 30 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 55% (392-326) | Career Total W/L | 64% (160-89) |
| $1,497,842 | Career Prize Money | $5,000 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomljanovic VS Masarova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mona Barthel
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Nao Hibino
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
43
Total Points Won
46
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Nao Hibino
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Irem Kurt
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Alina Charaeva
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Mayar Sherif
55%
(
77 of
140)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
48%
(
67 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Dalila Spiteri
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Irina Fetecau
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Alina Charaeva
77%
(
79 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
13
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ruth Roura Llaverias
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (392/326) | Win/Loss | 64% (160/89) |
| 53% (872/773) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (340/216) |
| 52% (7747/7271) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2775/2268) |
| 57% (283/216) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (71/35) |
| 45% (49/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (59/33) |
| 58% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (30/21) |
| 52% (34/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 986 | Aces Total | 401 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1511 | Total Double Faults | 1151 |
| 1:11:45 | Average Match Time | 1:41:56 |
| 460.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.3 |
| 65% (24436/37437) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9487/15496) |
| 61% (14816/24436) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5900/9487) |
| 46% (6037/12998) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2566/6009) |
| 48% (2171/4568) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1114/2196) |
| 45% (16861/37726) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7708/15742) |
| 47% (35/40) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (28/36) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (103/104) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (193/134) | Challenger W/L | 63% (124/74) |
| 83% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 71% (35/14) |
| 55% (385/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (153/240) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (84/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (26/53) |
| 57% (121/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (38/65) |
| 86% (369/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (152/137) |
| 13% (369/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (152/14) |
| 20% (349/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (97/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
