Nadia Podoroska vs Jelena Ostapenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L L W L L
Form
L L W L W W W W W LH2H: Podoroska 0 - 0 Ostapenko
| Podoroska | Stats | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (12-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 166 | Ranking | 18 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 5 |
| 28 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 17 | Titles | 16 |
| 62% (398-247) | Career Total W/L | 62% (403-249) |
| $1,662,496 | Career Prize Money | $11,283,232 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Karolina Muchova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Nadia Podoroska
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Olivia Gadecki
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Nadia Podoroska
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Dayana Yastremska
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
117)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
12
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
83%
(
10 of
12)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
61 of
117)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Yufei Ren
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Nadia Podoroska
70%
(
89 of
128)
1st Serve %
65%
(
96 of
148)
1
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
9
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
55 of
96)
28%
(
11 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
15 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
51%
(
65 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
78 of
148)
141
Total Points Won
135
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Katerina Siniakova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Aryna Sabalenka
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Emma Navarro
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Dayana Yastremska
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (398/247) | Win/Loss | 62% (403/249) |
| 60% (877/589) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (884/634) |
| 54% (7131/6060) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7466/6479) |
| 58% (134/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (143/119) |
| 65% (254/135) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (114/56) |
| 40% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (93/50) |
| 38% (6/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 69% (53/24) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 600 | Aces Total | 1592 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 1921 | Total Double Faults | 2919 |
| 1:11:14 | Average Match Time | 1:13:11 |
| 453.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.6 |
| 64% (19588/30515) | 1st Serve % | 56% (20309/36317) |
| 61% (12023/19588) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13261/20309) |
| 44% (4839/10909) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (6961/15994) |
| 48% (1973/4129) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2254/4602) |
| 47% (14574/31064) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16633/35979) |
| 48% (19/21) | Slam W/L | 62% (59/36) |
| 50% (13/13) | Masters W/L | 53% (86/75) |
| 65% (11/6) | Cups W/L | 58% (18/13) |
| 48% (63/67) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (138/90) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (206/105) | Challenger W/L | 66% (53/27) |
| 71% (86/35) | Futures W/L | 86% (49/8) |
| 62% (389/629) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (393/638) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 58% (75/130) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (74/132) |
| 53% (96/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (135/220) |
| 89% (388/345) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/330) |
| 11% (388/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (382/52) |
| 19% (257/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (270/71) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
