Matthew Dellavedova vs Luke Sorensen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
W L W L W L W W L LH2H: Dellavedova 1 - 0 Sorensen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dellavedova winning 2 and Sorensen winning 0. The last match between Dellavedova and Sorensen was at the M25 Canberra, 30-03-2022, First, Clay with Matthew Dellavedova getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matthew Dellavedova | 1 |
| Luke Sorensen | 0 |
M25 Canberra(30-03-2022)
6
3
6
1
| Dellavedova | Stats | Sorensen |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 398 | Ranking | N/A |
| 334 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 24 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (294-250) | Career Total W/L | 55% (52-43) |
| $3,550 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dellavedova VS Sorensen H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Luke Sorensen
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Dellavedova VS Sorensen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve % | 49% (24/49) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (15/24) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (24/49) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matthew Dellavedova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
15
Total Points Won
13
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moise Kouame
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
S Mert Ozdemir
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
125)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
125)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(2) 6-7(13) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Vaksmann
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matas Vasiliauskas
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Mert Alkaya
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Sorensen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabio Nestola
Player
Luke Sorensen
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Luke Sorensen
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Sorensen
Player
Ivan Perez Martin
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
79%
(
62 of
78)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Donski
Player
Luke Sorensen
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-7(8) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cade Birrell
Player
Luke Sorensen
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (294/250) | Win/Loss | 55% (52/43) |
| 52% (642/588) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (112/100) |
| 52% (5820/5466) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1029/1036) |
| 57% (156/118) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (42/35) |
| 53% (131/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
| 17% (2/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 577 | Aces Total | 271 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 721 | Total Double Faults | 157 |
| 1:11:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 387.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 179.09 |
| 69% (16843/24340) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2145/3391) |
| 63% (10664/16843) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1460/2145) |
| 50% (3724/7497) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (569/1246) |
| 44% (1046/2376) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (98/217) |
| 40% (9423/23484) | Return Points Win % | 36% (1126/3135) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (25/43) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (268/205) | Futures W/L | 55% (52/42) |
| 54% (286/531) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (43/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
| 61% (90/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 87% (287/249) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (48/46) |
| 13% (287/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (48/2) |
| 16% (257/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (47/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
