Prediction of Marton Fucsovics [90th] vs Jesper De Jong [94th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W W W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Fucsovics 0 - 0 Jong
| Fucsovics | Stats | Jong |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (19-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 90 | Ranking | 94 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 94 |
| 33 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (480-355) | Career Total W/L | 63% (266-158) |
| $4,503,379 | Career Prize Money | $526,725 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marton Fucsovics vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fucsovics 0 - 0 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fucsovics has won 45.48% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 46.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fucsovics, in recent form, has won 39.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 42.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.87% and 23.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fucsovics has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 55.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fucsovics has won 62% of matches played (W/L 31/ 19), with Jong winning 64.47% (W/L 49/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fucsovics has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 123/ 90), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 153/ 114). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Fucsovics has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 7), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.96% of matches (W/L 31/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fucsovics has played against opponents with an average rank of 154.9 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 230.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fucsovics has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fucsovics has converted 25.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Marton Fucsovics vs Jesper De Jong Best Odds For The Match
Marton Fucsovics Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Sebastian Baez
Player
Marton Fucsovics
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Christopher O'Connell
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Luca Nardi
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Marton Fucsovics
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Vilius Gaubas
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Marton Fucsovics
70%
(
101 of
145)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
40%
(
58 of
145)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
113)
129
Total Points Won
129
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Benjamin Hassan
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Henrique Rocha
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Marton Fucsovics
50%
(
56 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
25 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Jesper De Jong
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fucsovics vs Jong?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fucsovics Vs Jong is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (480/355) | Win/Loss | 63% (266/158) |
| 56% (1148/919) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (586/383) |
| 52% (10348/9448) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5014/4177) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2962 | Aces Total | 1703 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2255 | Total Double Faults | 1079 |
| 1:29:52 | Average Match Time | 1:39:23 |
| 442.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.57 |
| 58% (30751/53054) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17194/28557) |
| 71% (21690/30751) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (12043/17194) |
| 52% (11563/22302) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5790/11363) |
| 41% (2238/5455) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1313/3067) |
| 40% (21560/54072) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11957/28817) |
| 59% (434/741) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (254/405) |
| 50% (42/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 47% (144/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (74/144) |
| 55% (151/275) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (65/124) |
| 83% (472/391) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (260/231) |
| 17% (472/81) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (260/29) |
| 25% (363/89) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (164/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
