G. M. Perricard
To Win
M. Navone
To Win
Mariano Navone vs Matteo Arnaldi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W L W L
Form
W L L W W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Navone 0 - 0 Arnaldi
| Navone | Stats | Arnaldi |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (11-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 85 | Ranking | 44 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 30 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 6 |
| 62% (234-146) | Career Total W/L | 61% (224-143) |
| $786,850 | Career Prize Money | $2,239,275 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
Arnaldi VS TBD
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mariano Navone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
David Goffin
Player
Mariano Navone
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
52 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Laslo Djere
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Mariano Navone
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Arnaldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Yibing Wu
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
84 of
114)
16
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
84)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Andrey Rublev
43%
(
30 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
81%
(
21 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (234/146) | Win/Loss | 61% (224/143) |
| 59% (530/371) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (522/363) |
| 54% (4566/3967) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4436/3939) |
| 33% (8/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (80/47) |
| 65% (224/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (125/66) |
| 29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (15/26) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 362 | Aces Total | 1419 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 952 | Total Double Faults | 1021 |
| 1:40:20 | Average Match Time | 1:43:35 |
| 309.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 234.94 |
| 66% (15292/23134) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14912/25248) |
| 62% (9485/15292) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10160/14912) |
| 48% (3786/7842) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5185/10331) |
| 47% (1384/2949) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1085/2510) |
| 45% (10815/23794) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9950/24709) |
| 20% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 61% (17/11) |
| 31% (4/9) | Masters W/L | 56% (25/20) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 53% (25/22) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (26/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (75/38) | Challenger W/L | 60% (73/49) |
| 65% (126/67) | Futures W/L | 70% (78/33) |
| 62% (228/370) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (209/339) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 54% (51/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (67/118) |
| 54% (71/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (62/122) |
| 84% (228/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (227/189) |
| 16% (228/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (227/38) |
| 28% (152/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (139/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
