Liam Branger vs Matthew Hulme Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W W L
Form
W L W L L W L L W LH2H: Branger 1 - 0 Hulme
They have played 2 sets in total, with Branger winning 2 and Hulme winning 0. The last match between Branger and Hulme was at the Noumea Challenger, 30-12-2024, Q3, Hard with Liam Branger getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Liam Branger | 1 |
| Matthew Hulme | 0 |
Noumea Challenger(30-12-2024)
6
3
6
4
| Branger | Stats | Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (2-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (8-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 861 |
| Highest Rank | 777 | |
| 24 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (24-20) | Career Total W/L | 50% (65-65) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Liam Branger
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:48 | Average Match Time | 1:14:48 |
| 62% (32/52) | 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) |
| 88% (28/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (25/40) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 71% (10/14) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (19/54) | Return Points Win % | 21% (11/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Liam Branger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Liam Branger
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Adam Taylor
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Liam Branger
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Felix Einig
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Liam Branger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
117)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 7-6(14) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Daniil Glinka
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Benjamin Vitter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Jadoun
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
6
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Matthias Ujvary
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
James Watt
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
5
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
12 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
5
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Hulme
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Sam Young-Mathers
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Matthew Hulme
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Yi Zhou
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (24/20) | Win/Loss | 50% (65/65) |
| 57% (56/42) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (154/151) |
| 53% (509/445) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1589/1532) |
| 60% (6/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (56/51) |
| 52% (11/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) |
| 54% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 161 | Aces Total | 524 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 125 | Total Double Faults | 203 |
| 1:16:34 | Average Match Time | 1:14:24 |
| 123.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.85 |
| 63% (1357/2165) | 1st Serve % | 68% (4563/6706) |
| 69% (935/1357) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3192/4563) |
| 49% (399/808) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1089/2143) |
| 48% (101/211) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (186/478) |
| 41% (881/2128) | Return Points Win % | 35% (2301/6569) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 54% (22/19) | Futures W/L | 50% (56/56) |
| 55% (24/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (63/128) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (23/54) |
| 20% (2/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 82% (28/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (64/51) |
| 18% (28/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (64/13) |
| 6% (16/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (66/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
