L. Tien
To Win
M. Giron
To Win
Learner Tien vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L W W L
Form
W L L W W L W L W LHead To Head: Tien 0 - 0 Mendez
| Tien | Stats | Mendez |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (13-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 69 | Ranking | 231 |
| 66 | Highest Rank | 222 |
| 19 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 3 |
| 73% (118-43) | Career Total W/L | 52% (67-63) |
| $451,435 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Samsonova VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Learner Tien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
40%
(
27 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
18
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Alexis Galarneau
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rafael Jodar
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
12
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Mark Lajal
52%
(
74 of
141)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
126)
14
Aces
6
14
Double Faults
7
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
58 of
81)
49%
(
33 of
67)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
51 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
41 of
126)
131
Total Points Won
136
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Mateus Alves
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73% (118/43) | Win/Loss | 52% (67/63) |
| 65% (258/136) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (154/144) |
| 55% (2050/1647) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1445/1361) |
| 76% (92/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (32/26) |
| 45% (5/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (31/35) |
| 72% (21/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 423 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 462 | Total Double Faults | 382 |
| 1:41:39 | Average Match Time | 1:38:21 |
| 333.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.78 |
| 63% (7296/11605) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4959/8139) |
| 67% (4916/7296) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3376/4959) |
| 51% (2219/4309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1641/3179) |
| 47% (596/1263) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (359/882) |
| 43% (4905/11540) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3457/8533) |
| 60% (6/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 65% (15/8) | Main Tour W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 76% (39/12) | Challenger W/L | 39% (26/41) |
| 79% (58/15) | Futures W/L | 74% (37/13) |
| 75% (110/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (66/129) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 62% (39/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (21/43) |
| 75% (39/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (17/38) |
| 95% (102/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (68/58) |
| 5% (102/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (68/10) |
| 36% (59/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (62/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
