Prediction of Learner Tien [69th] vs Botic Van De Zandschulp [88th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L L W W
Form
W L W L W W L L W LHead-2-Head: Tien 1 - 0 Zandschulp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Tien and Zandschulp was at the BMW Open - Munich, 13-04-2025, Q3, Clay with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Learner Tien | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 0 |
| Tien | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (8-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 69 | Ranking | 88 |
| 66 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 19 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 7 |
| 74% (118-42) | Career Total W/L | 62% (361-225) |
| $431,935 | Career Prize Money | $3,420,360 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Tien VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Tien VS Zandschulp H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:16:18 | Average Match Time | 1:16:18 |
| 58% (29/50) | 1st Serve % | 48% (26/54) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (16/26) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 56% (30/54) | Return Points Win % | 36% (18/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Learner Tien vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tien 1 - 0 Zandschulp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tien has won 41.16% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 42.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tien, in recent form, has won 48.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 46.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.06% and 27.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tien has saved 54.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tien has won 80% of matches played (W/L 72/ 18), with Zandschulp winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tien has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 76% (W/L 92/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Tien has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 81.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 7), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tien winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Tien and Zandschulp was at the BMW Open - Munich, 13-04-2025, Q3, Clay with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tien and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tien winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tien winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tien has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.92 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 138.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tien has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tien has converted 35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 30.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Henri Squire
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Learner Tien
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Dusan Lajovic
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Tien vs Zandschulp?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Tien Vs Zandschulp is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74% (118/42) | Win/Loss | 62% (361/225) |
| 66% (258/134) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (822/586) |
| 56% (2044/1635) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7057/6235) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 470 | Aces Total | 2857 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 459 | Total Double Faults | 2125 |
| 1:41:51 | Average Match Time | 1:35:25 |
| 173.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.11 |
| 63% (7257/11542) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23829/38718) |
| 67% (4892/7257) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17021/23829) |
| 51% (2206/4285) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7177/14892) |
| 47% (596/1259) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1767/4096) |
| 43% (4891/11488) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16238/39906) |
| 75% (110/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (334/535) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 62% (39/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (100/180) |
| 75% (39/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (111/193) |
| 95% (102/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (340/301) |
| 5% (102/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (340/38) |
| 36% (58/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (244/59) |
See recent tennis photos of Tien and Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Learner Tien
View full predicted draw for Tien in Munich
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
