K. Boulter
To Win
J. Paolini
To Win
Laura Siegemund vs Katie Boulter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L L L L
Form
W L W L W L L W L WH2H: Siegemund 0 - 2 Boulter
They have played 4 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 0 and Boulter winning 4. The last match between Siegemund and Boulter was at the Billie Jean King Cup, Finals, 15-11-2024, Rubber 2, I.hard with Katie Boulter getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 0 |
| Katie Boulter | 2 |
Billie Jean King Cup, Finals(15-11-2024)
6
1
6
2
| Siegemund | Stats | Boulter |
|---|---|---|
| 35% (6-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (6-5) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 95 | Ranking | 40 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 23 |
| 37 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 10 |
| 59% (532-368) | Career Total W/L | 62% (339-210) |
| $2,948,445 | Career Prize Money | $2,322,414 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Katie Boulter
Player
Laura Siegemund
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Laura Siegemund
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 11 | Games Won | 24 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:24:0 | Average Match Time | 1:24:0 |
| 72% (82/114) | 1st Serve % | 57% (59/103) |
| 61% (50/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (45/59) |
| 22% (7/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
| 32% (33/103) | Return Points Win % | 50% (57/114) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Laura Siegemund
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Laura Siegemund
50%
(
59 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Laura Siegemund
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Laura Siegemund
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ana Konjuh
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Laura Siegemund
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
85 of
116)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Laura Siegemund
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Laura Siegemund
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Player
Laura Siegemund
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Katie Boulter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Katerina Siniakova
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Katie Boulter
106%
(
69 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Tatjana Maria
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
115%
(
60 of
52)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Katie Boulter
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Katie Boulter
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Irina-Camelia Begu
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Katie Boulter
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Rebecca Marino
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Katie Boulter
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Olivia Gadecki
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (532/368) | Win/Loss | 62% (339/210) |
| 57% (1190/885) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (746/505) |
| 53% (10036/8909) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6216/5396) |
| 51% (140/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (175/117) |
| 65% (339/185) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 53% (40/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (96/45) |
| 50% (13/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (51/33) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 430 | Aces Total | 1589 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1632 | Total Double Faults | 1763 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:15:31 |
| 476.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.69 |
| 70% (23763/33976) | 1st Serve % | 56% (16106/28946) |
| 60% (14276/23763) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (11110/16106) |
| 46% (4706/10195) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5903/12836) |
| 48% (2128/4473) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1613/3534) |
| 46% (15844/34268) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13039/29674) |
| 52% (42/39) | Slam W/L | 47% (22/25) |
| 53% (47/41) | Masters W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 57% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 68% (13/6) |
| 57% (142/109) | Main Tour W/L | 62% (72/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (239/157) | Challenger W/L | 64% (134/74) |
| 75% (58/19) | Futures W/L | 66% (75/38) |
| 59% (524/887) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (334/529) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (93/178) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (76/132) |
| 54% (151/282) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (99/168) |
| 87% (512/443) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (320/280) |
| 13% (512/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (320/36) |
| 23% (387/88) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (228/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
