B. Nakashima
To Win
S. Ofner
To Win
Juncheng Shang vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W W L L
Form
W L W W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Shang 0 - 0 Nakashima
| Shang | Stats | Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (3-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (12-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 60 | Ranking | 32 |
| 47 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 20 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 8 |
| 62% (133-81) | Career Total W/L | 61% (238-151) |
| $1,336,965 | Career Prize Money | $3,035,300 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juncheng Shang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Juncheng Shang
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Juncheng Shang
59%
(
13 of
22)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
17
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Fabian Marozsan
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
4
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Juncheng Shang
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve %
82%
(
14 of
17)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
24
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Juncheng Shang
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
3-4(4) 4-2 4-2 4-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Juncheng Shang
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-3(3) 2-4 4-1 4-3(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Juncheng Shang
71%
(
82 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
47 of
58)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Juncheng Shang
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (133/81) | Win/Loss | 61% (238/151) |
| 58% (309/220) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (569/389) |
| 52% (2698/2492) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5025/4409) |
| 66% (72/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (118/76) |
| 63% (38/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (31/30) |
| 41% (9/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (65/29) |
| 61% (14/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (24/16) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
| 690 | Aces Total | 2613 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 563 | Total Double Faults | 667 |
| 1:52:34 | Average Match Time | 1:44:53 |
| 291.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.3 |
| 64% (10408/16292) | 1st Serve % | 64% (17964/28288) |
| 70% (7234/10408) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (13387/17964) |
| 53% (3092/5884) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5589/10324) |
| 41% (614/1489) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (939/2479) |
| 38% (6103/16132) | Return Points Win % | 37% (10915/29442) |
| 61% (14/9) | Slam W/L | 49% (19/20) |
| 46% (12/14) | Masters W/L | 48% (27/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
| 61% (33/21) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (80/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (49/32) | Challenger W/L | 70% (92/40) |
| 83% (25/5) | Futures W/L | 74% (17/6) |
| 65% (126/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (212/346) |
| 43% (6/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 56% (57/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (118/215) |
| 63% (52/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (61/122) |
| 84% (135/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (240/206) |
| 16% (135/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (240/34) |
| 27% (79/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (148/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
