P. Bertran
To Win
TBD
To Win
Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Peter Bertran Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
W W L L L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Ficovich 2 - 0 Bertran
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ficovich winning 4 and Bertran winning 1. The last match between Ficovich and Bertran was at the Cali Challenger, 17-09-2024, First, Clay with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Juan Pablo Ficovich | 2 |
| Peter Bertran | 0 |
Cali Challenger(17-09-2024)
6
4
4
6
6
0
| Ficovich | Stats | Bertran |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (21-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (6-5) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 145 | Ranking | 492 |
| 125 | Highest Rank | 461 |
| 28 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 13 | Titles | 5 |
| 57% (399-304) | Career Total W/L | 57% (181-139) |
| $322,630 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Bertran VS TBD
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Avanesyan VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Peter Bertran
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
11
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Peter Bertran
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 15 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:47:27 | Average Match Time | 1:47:27 |
| 49% (64/131) | 1st Serve % | 54% (84/155) |
| 80% (51/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (52/84) |
| 60% (40/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (32/71) |
| 38% (8/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 46% (71/155) | Return Points Win % | 31% (40/131) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Miguel Tobon
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Maxime Janvier
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
82)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Zachary Svajda
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Bertran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Blu Baker
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Joshua Lapadat
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Arseneault
Player
Peter Bertran
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Alberto Puello
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Peter Bertran
49%
(
40 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Secord
Player
Peter Bertran
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
100%
(
9 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
Player
Peter Bertran
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Mikael Arseneault
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
67 of
122)
7
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
13
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
34 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (399/304) | Win/Loss | 57% (181/139) |
| 55% (903/726) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (398/332) |
| 52% (8046/7391) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3513/3254) |
| 47% (42/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (110/77) |
| 60% (348/235) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (70/59) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2047 | Aces Total | 616 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1227 | Total Double Faults | 1110 |
| 1:28:50 | Average Match Time | 1:22:54 |
| 452.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 161.47 |
| 62% (25809/41872) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9970/16381) |
| 68% (17536/25809) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6591/9970) |
| 51% (8184/16063) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3057/6409) |
| 41% (1836/4426) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (784/1767) |
| 41% (17353/42745) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6796/16420) |
| 37% (7/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 45% (9/11) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (176/167) | Challenger W/L | 6% (1/15) |
| 64% (206/114) | Futures W/L | 59% (178/122) |
| 56% (393/696) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (176/314) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (98/206) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (41/76) |
| 52% (117/227) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (55/97) |
| 84% (396/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (170/150) |
| 16% (396/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (170/20) |
| 20% (306/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (149/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
