T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
H. Medjedovic
To Win
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Hamad Medjedovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L W L
Form
W L W L W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Cosano 0 - 0 Medjedovic
| Cosano | Stats | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (7-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (17-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 275 | Ranking | 61 |
| 211 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 9 |
| 60% (354-233) | Career Total W/L | 64% (162-90) |
| $107,105 | Career Prize Money | $764,910 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cosano VS Medjedovic H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
John Echeverria
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Klizan
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31
Total Points Won
27
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
79%
(
81 of
103)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
9
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
56 of
69)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (354/233) | Win/Loss | 64% (162/90) |
| 58% (785/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (356/229) |
| 53% (6683/5854) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3004/2547) |
| 55% (29/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
| 61% (315/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (83/39) |
| 47% (9/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (38/23) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 945 | Aces Total | 1658 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1463 | Total Double Faults | 826 |
| 1:33:47 | Average Match Time | 1:37:14 |
| 429.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 309.78 |
| 65% (23421/35963) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10537/16923) |
| 64% (14954/23421) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7629/10537) |
| 48% (6058/12542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3259/6386) |
| 46% (1927/4230) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (696/1610) |
| 44% (15911/36510) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6650/17006) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 67% (14/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (32/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (105/115) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
| 69% (246/112) | Futures W/L | 70% (43/18) |
| 60% (343/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (152/237) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 56% (81/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (50/102) |
| 54% (99/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (42/71) |
| 87% (342/298) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/142) |
| 13% (342/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/17) |
| 22% (245/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (92/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
