J. Nikles
To Win
T. Lamasine
To Win
Hazem Naow vs Johan Nikles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W L L
Form
W W L L L L L W W LHead To Head: Naow 1 - 0 Nikles
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Nikles winning 0. The last match between Naow and Nikles was at the M15 Pontevedra, 12-10-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hazem Naow getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hazem Naow | 1 |
| Johan Nikles | 0 |
M15 Pontevedra(12-10-2024)
7
6
6
4
| Naow | Stats | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 571 | Ranking | 647 |
| 299 | Highest Rank | 256 |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 4 |
| 64% (170-97) | Career Total W/L | 58% (296-213) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $11,650 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-4 |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:7:0 | Average Match Time | 2:7:0 |
| 60% (39/65) | 1st Serve % | 65% (53/82) |
| 67% (26/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (30/53) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 49% (40/82) | Return Points Win % | 43% (28/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Hazem Naow
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Hazem Naow
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
80 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
50 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Matisse Bobichon
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hazem Naow
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mika Brunold
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yaroslav Demin
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Johan Nikles
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Alexis Canter
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Billy Suarez
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillaume Dalmasso
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Johan Nikles
92%
(
48 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Johan Nikles
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Tuncay Duran
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Valentin Lapalu
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (170/97) | Win/Loss | 58% (296/213) |
| 62% (374/233) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (655/506) |
| 54% (3061/2561) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5643/5025) |
| 70% (75/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (88/55) |
| 58% (60/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (200/137) |
| 63% (35/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28% (8/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 385 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 690 | Total Double Faults | 1066 |
| 1:22:11 | Average Match Time | 1:22:24 |
| 401.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 493.47 |
| 67% (9776/14507) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19180/28773) |
| 65% (6326/9776) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (11611/19180) |
| 48% (2255/4731) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4564/9593) |
| 46% (801/1757) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1651/3579) |
| 44% (6478/14781) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13074/29005) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (30/28) | Challenger W/L | 51% (42/41) |
| 67% (139/67) | Futures W/L | 60% (250/164) |
| 63% (166/262) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (292/501) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (32/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (58/108) |
| 51% (38/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (83/149) |
| 90% (165/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (277/244) |
| 10% (165/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (277/32) |
| 22% (102/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (232/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
