F. Cerundolo
To Win
F. Comesana
To Win
Francisco Comesana vs Vilius Gaubas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W L W W
Form
W W W W W L W W W WH2H: Comesana 0 - 0 Gaubas
| Comesana | Stats | Gaubas |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (17-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (14-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 70 | Ranking | 149 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 6 |
| 64% (284-158) | Career Total W/L | 60% (143-96) |
| $633,595 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Final
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Francisco Comesana
Player
Arthur Fils
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
16
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Carlos Taberner
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Gregoire Barrere
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Tristan Boyer
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Gastao Elias
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Francisco Comesana
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Lukas Neumayer
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
75%
(
76 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Oleg Prihodko
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
55 of
82)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
29 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Sebastian Ofner
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ignacio Buse
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Sebastian Ofner
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (284/158) | Win/Loss | 60% (143/96) |
| 61% (622/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (316/248) |
| 54% (5131/4375) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2798/2563) |
| 52% (22/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (16/17) |
| 66% (260/135) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (123/69) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (4/10) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1282 | Aces Total | 511 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 712 | Total Double Faults | 417 |
| 1:31:43 | Average Match Time | 1:47:46 |
| 344.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 389.7 |
| 67% (16945/25407) | 1st Serve % | 65% (10431/15938) |
| 67% (11271/16945) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6839/10431) |
| 50% (4269/8462) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2696/5507) |
| 44% (1271/2899) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (747/1652) |
| 42% (11075/26118) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6522/15759) |
| 54% (7/6) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 63% (5/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 43% (12/16) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (106/54) | Challenger W/L | 56% (51/40) |
| 66% (154/79) | Futures W/L | 65% (88/48) |
| 65% (274/423) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (140/235) |
| 60% (6/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (65/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (36/65) |
| 60% (74/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (56/88) |
| 90% (271/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (122/107) |
| 10% (271/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (122/15) |
| 23% (171/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (117/36) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
