Filippo Mora vs Jonas Trinker Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W W L L
Form
W L W L L W L W W LHead To Head: Mora 1 - 0 Trinker
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mora winning 2 and Trinker winning 1. The last match between Mora and Trinker was at the Italy F13, 30-05-2016, Q2 round, Clay with Filippo Mora getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filippo Mora | 1 |
| Jonas Trinker | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Filippo Mora Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Igor Sijsling
Player
Filippo Mora
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Filippo Mora
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Mora
Player
Tommaso Schold
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
11 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
55 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Filippo Mora
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Jonas Trinker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Jonas Trinker
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
79%
(
65 of
82)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Mohamed Safwat
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Michael Zhu
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve %
91%
(
43 of
47)
8
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olle Wallin
Player
Jonas Trinker
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Alexander Wagner
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Jonas Trinker
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filippo Mazzola
Player
Jonas Trinker
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Erwin Troebinger
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Jonas Trinker
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
Player
Jonas Trinker
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 1-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (28/34) | Win/Loss | 52% (216/199) |
| 47% (65/73) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (492/451) |
| 48% (572/629) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4553/4407) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 836 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 23 | Total Double Faults | 647 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 230.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 352.69 |
| 63% (343/542) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8155/13420) |
| 52% (180/343) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5431/8155) |
| 41% (81/199) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2317/5264) |
| 43% (19/44) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (556/1272) |
| 38% (182/481) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5215/13045) |
| 45% (28/62) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (215/414) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (59/101) |
| 36% (5/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (53/114) |
| 83% (30/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (228/192) |
| 17% (30/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (228/36) |
| 9% (32/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (187/24) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
