Federico Valle vs Martin Van Der Meerschen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L L L L
Form
L W W W W W W L L LHead To Head: Valle 1 - 0 Meerschen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Valle winning 2 and Meerschen winning 1. The last match between Valle and Meerschen was at the M15 Tsaghkadzor, 21-10-2024, Q3, Clay with Federico Valle getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 10-6.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Valle | 1 |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | 0 |
M15 Tsaghkadzor(21-10-2024)
7
6
2
6
10
6
| Valle | Stats | Meerschen |
|---|---|---|
| 30% (3-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (10-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 829 |
| Highest Rank | 829 | |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 45% (76-94) | Career Total W/L | 53% (78-69) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 10-6 |
Stats 
Federico Valle
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 18 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:43:0 | Average Match Time | 1:43:0 |
| 73% (53/73) | 1st Serve % | 66% (44/67) |
| 74% (39/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (34/44) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (15/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 27% (18/67) | Return Points Win % | 33% (24/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Valle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Federico Valle
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Valle
Player
Mahmut Emre Gurmeric
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Martin Van Der Meerschen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Artur Kukasian
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Nicolas Ifi
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
28 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Giovanni Agostinetto
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (76/94) | Win/Loss | 53% (78/69) |
| 45% (168/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (176/159) |
| 48% (1746/1896) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1639/1585) |
| 38% (6/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) |
| 46% (70/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (55/44) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 86 | Aces Total | 197 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 146 | Total Double Faults | 274 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:44 |
| 158.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 323.4 |
| 61% (1997/3254) | 1st Serve % | 66% (4686/7084) |
| 61% (1222/1997) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2956/4686) |
| 48% (600/1257) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1178/2398) |
| 40% (102/257) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (337/745) |
| 36% (1112/3079) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2945/7029) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (76/94) | Futures W/L | 53% (78/69) |
| 46% (76/167) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (77/146) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (19/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (28/40) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 89% (73/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (79/66) |
| 11% (73/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (79/13) |
| 12% (97/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (68/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
