Emil Ruusuvuori vs Diego Sebastian Schwartzman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
W L L W W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Ruusuvuori 1 - 1 Schwartzman
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 3 and Schwartzman winning 2. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Schwartzman was at the Hamburg European Open - Hamburg, 19-07-2022, First, Clay with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emil Ruusuvuori | 1 |
| Diego Sebastian Schwartzman | 1 |
Hamburg European Open - Hamburg(19-07-2022)
| Ruusuvuori | Stats | Schwartzman |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (5-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 228 | Ranking | 442 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 8 |
| 26 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 20 |
| 61% (284-185) | Career Total W/L | 60% (579-386) |
| $2,614,675 | Career Prize Money | $9,448,195 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruusuvuori VS Schwartzman H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Ruusuvuori VS Schwartzman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 26 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:32:27 | Average Match Time | 2:32:27 |
| 69% (122/177) | 1st Serve % | 63% (117/185) |
| 62% (76/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (79/117) |
| 49% (27/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (27/68) |
| 38% (8/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (8/20) |
| 43% (79/185) | Return Points Win % | 42% (74/177) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Matisse Bobichon
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Nicolas Jarry
67%
(
76 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(10) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
54%
(
65 of
121)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
136
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Vilius Gaubas
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
15
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
133)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
58 of
94)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
123
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Lukas Neumayer
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (284/185) | Win/Loss | 60% (579/386) |
| 58% (640/467) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1362/988) |
| 53% (5643/4955) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (11706/10260) |
| 65% (120/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (110/102) |
| 47% (47/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (429/234) |
| 67% (103/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (30/33) |
| 48% (14/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 37% (10/17) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1725 | Aces Total | 1352 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1372 | Total Double Faults | 2196 |
| 1:34:15 | Average Match Time | 1:23:5 |
| 355.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 462.22 |
| 65% (20022/30988) | 1st Serve % | 64% (35558/55981) |
| 71% (14199/20022) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (23012/35558) |
| 51% (5562/10966) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10189/20416) |
| 42% (1304/3127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2947/6575) |
| 40% (12746/31842) | Return Points Win % | 43% (24537/57156) |
| 39% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 61% (71/45) |
| 51% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 51% (72/69) |
| 67% (14/7) | Cups W/L | 42% (11/15) |
| 57% (86/64) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (140/119) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 63% (71/42) | Challenger W/L | 66% (151/79) |
| 73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 71% (132/55) |
| 62% (269/433) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (515/857) |
| 39% (11/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 59% (61/103) |
| 53% (81/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (150/281) |
| 56% (74/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (157/283) |
| 89% (285/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (550/483) |
| 11% (285/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (550/66) |
| 16% (182/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (415/95) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
