Daniele Capecchi vs Tilen Zitnik Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
L L W W L L W L W LH2H: Capecchi 1 - 0 Zitnik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Capecchi winning 2 and Zitnik winning 0. The last match between Capecchi and Zitnik was at the Croatia F2 (Porec), 13-03-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Daniele Capecchi getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniele Capecchi | 1 |
| Tilen Zitnik | 0 |
| Capecchi | Stats | Zitnik |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 760 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 473 | Highest Rank | |
| 29 | Age | 33 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (268-209) | Career Total W/L | 34% (34-67) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniele Capecchi vs Tilen Zitnik Best Odds For The Match
Daniele Capecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Daniele Capecchi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Moundir
Player
Daniele Capecchi
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniele Capecchi
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
62 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Johannes Haerteis
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Dusan Obradovic
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Bor Artnak
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
43%
(
44 of
102)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
23%
(
6 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Michele Ribecai
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tilen Zitnik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Tilen Zitnik
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Pre-Q | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Capecchi vs Zitnik?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Capecchi Vs Zitnik is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (268/209) | Win/Loss | 34% (34/67) |
| 55% (606/486) | Sets Win/Loss | 37% (85/142) |
| 53% (5181/4661) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (873/1108) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 461 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 977 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 1:3:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 208 | Average Opponent Rank | 80.29 |
| 68% (12379/18333) | 1st Serve % | 61% (201/327) |
| 63% (7772/12379) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (127/201) |
| 44% (2617/5954) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (56/126) |
| 44% (980/2223) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (10/18) |
| 44% (8199/18576) | Return Points Win % | 35% (97/278) |
| 56% (265/472) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (33/99) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (43/87) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 50% (68/137) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (9/27) |
| 86% (265/227) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (41/30) |
| 14% (265/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (41/9) |
| 20% (212/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (60/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
