Prediction of Dan Added [407th] vs Manuel Plunger [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L L W W W L L L LH2H: Added 1 - 0 Plunger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Added winning 2 and Plunger winning 0. The last match between Added and Plunger was at the M25 Trento, 20-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Dan Added getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dan Added | 1 |
| Manuel Plunger | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Dan Added
Player
Manuel Plunger
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:10:16 | Average Match Time | 1:10:16 |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve % | 48% (23/48) |
| 83% (19/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 77% (10/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (8/25) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (28/48) | Return Points Win % | 19% (7/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dan Added vs Manuel Plunger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Added 1 - 0 Plunger
Editorial Prediction:
- In recent form, there has been a slight disparity in the second serve performance: Over the past six months, Added has emerged victorious in 51.17% of points on their second serve, while Plunger has claimed 50%. The accuracy of match predictions is closely associated with this particular statistical measure.
- Return game statistics also offer valuable insights: Recent return game statistics indicate that Added has triumphed in 50.87% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Plunger's success rate stands at 49.37%. When it comes to first serve returns, Added has achieved a success rate of 34.6%, compared to Plunger's 35.36%. These figures play a significant role in determining the favorite in this head-to-head encounter.
- An evaluation under pressure reveals interesting findings: In recent form, Added has successfully saved 57.79% of breakpoints, while Plunger's save percentage is slightly lower at 57.42%. Such statistics prove to be instrumental in making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the previous year, Added has emerged victorious in 56.52% of their matches (39 wins, 30 losses), whereas Plunger boasts a higher success rate of 62.26% (33 wins, 20 losses). These statistics provide a holistic prediction overview for their head-to-head encounters.
- Considering the impact of playing surface: Added has excelled on the hard surface throughout their career, attaining a 61% win rate (106 wins, 67 losses), while their performance on grass has been less impressive with a win rate of 33% (1 win, 2 losses). Conversely, Plunger has found their greatest success on indoor hard courts, achieving a win rate of 63% (5 wins, 3 losses), while their performance on hard courts has been abysmal with a win rate of 0% (0 wins, 1 loss).
- Analyzing player level: In the past year, Added has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize money of $10K, securing victory in 59.09% of their matches (26 wins, 18 losses). Conversely, Plunger has primarily participated in the same tournaments, winning 62.26% of their matches (33 wins, 20 losses). When comparing these statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative level of the events they have participated in.
- Examining opponent quality: During the previous 12 months, Added has faced opponents with an average rank of 471.33, while Plunger has encountered players with an average rank of 164.55.
- Deciding set performance in relation to all players: For those engaged in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that in the past year Added has emerged victorious in 54% of deciding sets, while Plunger has achieved a success rate of 64% in all matches played on the professional circuit.
- Assessing current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance holds considerable value in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to analyze current event statistics to gauge the form of the players. Please refer to the section below for an update on their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players excel at specific tournaments, and this factor should be taken into consideration when predicting the outcome.
- Break point conversion rate: In recent matches, Added has successfully converted 40.16% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Plunger has capitalized on 46.04% of their chances to break the opponent's serve. These figures assume significant relevance for in-game live betting tips whenever either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in exploring models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article provides a commendable starting point (Warning: Designed for statistical enthusiasts).
Dan Added Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Lucas Poullain
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Leo Raquillet
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
60
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Ben Jones
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Brian Bozemoj
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Manuel Plunger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Manuel Plunger
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea De Marchi
Player
Manuel Plunger
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Manuel Plunger
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Plunger
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
48
Total Points Won
50
|
6-7(4) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manuel Plunger
Player
Alberto Morolli
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
42
|
6-7(6) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Plunger
Player
Giovanni Boi
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
90%
(
18 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Manuel Plunger
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michel Hopp
Player
Manuel Plunger
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Manuel Plunger
Player
Michele Prisciantelli
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (314/221) | Win/Loss | 56% (58/45) |
| 57% (710/531) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (126/101) |
| 53% (6175/5561) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1118/1024) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 2430 | Aces Total | 105 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 868 | Total Double Faults | 172 |
| 1:35:37 | Average Match Time | 1:7:38 |
| 496.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 195.94 |
| 59% (20656/34965) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2717/4182) |
| 70% (14548/20656) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1689/2717) |
| 50% (7149/14308) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (689/1465) |
| 43% (1462/3433) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (199/458) |
| 40% (13999/34993) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1788/4232) |
| 58% (309/529) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (56/101) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (96/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (10/17) |
| 51% (87/171) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (11/23) |
| 87% (315/274) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (60/52) |
| 13% (315/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (60/8) |
| 18% (220/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (43/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
