Chun Hsin Tseng vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W W L L
Form
W L L L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Tseng 0 - 2 Wong
They have played 4 sets in total, with Tseng winning 0 and Wong winning 4. The last match between Tseng and Wong was at the Matsuyama Challenger, 04-11-2024, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chun Hsin Tseng | 0 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 2 |
Matsuyama Challenger(04-11-2024)
6
2
6
2
| Tseng | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 46% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 98 | Ranking | 169 |
| 83 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 23 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 2 |
| 58% (251-181) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-110) |
| $358,975 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 13 | Games Won | 25 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:27:48 | Average Match Time | 1:27:48 |
| 49% (54/110) | 1st Serve % | 56% (79/142) |
| 67% (36/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (64/79) |
| 54% (30/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (30/63) |
| 0% (0/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 34% (48/142) | Return Points Win % | 40% (44/110) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Billy Harris
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
73%
(
32 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Christopher O'Connell
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Gregoire Barrere
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Mattia Bellucci
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
79%
(
22 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (251/181) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/110) |
| 56% (570/450) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/269) |
| 52% (5013/4555) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2855/2734) |
| 58% (103/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (115/80) |
| 61% (127/81) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (18/18) |
| 49% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1097 | Aces Total | 1315 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1034 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:43:9 | Average Match Time | 1:30:16 |
| 405.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.8 |
| 59% (17500/29568) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9202/15310) |
| 68% (11842/17500) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6508/9202) |
| 51% (6179/12068) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2957/6108) |
| 42% (1325/3139) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1449) |
| 41% (12222/29812) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5978/15446) |
| 38% (6/10) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 41% (7/10) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 58% (7/5) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 32% (11/23) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (151/105) | Challenger W/L | 55% (53/44) |
| 71% (69/28) | Futures W/L | 60% (72/49) |
| 59% (245/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/244) |
| 8% (1/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 47% (60/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (45/82) |
| 55% (81/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 84% (247/208) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 16% (247/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 23% (185/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (120/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
