C. O'Connell
To Win
C. U. Carabelli
To Win
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Gabriel Debru Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
W W W L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Carabelli 0 - 0 Debru
| Carabelli | Stats | Debru |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (20-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (3-3) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 59 | Ranking | 246 |
| 59 | Highest Rank | 233 |
| 25 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 5 |
| 64% (367-210) | Career Total W/L | 57% (101-75) |
| $399,935 | Career Prize Money | $31,000 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Alexandre Muller
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hugo Gaston
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Brandon Holt
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
8
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Debru Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Gabriel Debru
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Renzo Olivo
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Gabriel Debru
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
50 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Gabriel Debru
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Gabriel Debru
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Remy Bertola
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Ilia Simakin
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (367/210) | Win/Loss | 57% (101/75) |
| 60% (808/528) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (226/180) |
| 54% (6669/5674) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2032/1855) |
| 54% (35/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) |
| 65% (331/177) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (70/42) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (16/24) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1042 | Aces Total | 597 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1272 | Total Double Faults | 510 |
| 1:41:12 | Average Match Time | 1:47:32 |
| 365.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.94 |
| 62% (23143/37341) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7811/12386) |
| 66% (15369/23143) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5240/7811) |
| 50% (7030/14197) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2230/4575) |
| 45% (1993/4392) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (586/1331) |
| 43% (16322/37903) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5136/12391) |
| 42% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 43% (6/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (20/20) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (187/99) | Challenger W/L | 52% (53/49) |
| 67% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 67% (47/23) |
| 64% (356/555) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (99/170) |
| 54% (7/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (80/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (27/57) |
| 59% (104/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (33/58) |
| 89% (339/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (98/85) |
| 10% (339/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (98/12) |
| 27% (238/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (78/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
