B. Bonzi
To Win
H. Hurkacz
To Win
Benjamin Bonzi vs Lukas Rosol Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L L L W
Form
L L W L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Bonzi 0 - 2 Rosol
They have played 6 sets in total, with Bonzi winning 2 and Rosol winning 4. The last match between Bonzi and Rosol was at the Murcia Challenger, 10-04-2019, Second, Clay with Lukas Rosol getting the victory 2-6 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Bonzi | 0 |
| Lukas Rosol | 2 |
Murcia Challenger(10-04-2019)
2
6
6
4
7
5
| Bonzi | Stats | Rosol |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (11-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 62 | Ranking | 873 |
| 42 | Highest Rank | 26 |
| 28 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 23 | Titles | 20 |
| 61% (469-294) | Career Total W/L | 55% (667-544) |
| $1,913,390 | Career Prize Money | $1,884,780 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Lukas Rosol
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
66%
(
71 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 30 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:6:22 | Average Match Time | 2:6:22 |
| 60% (115/192) | 1st Serve % | 66% (143/218) |
| 66% (76/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (92/143) |
| 52% (40/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (34/75) |
| 28% (7/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (8/22) |
| 42% (92/218) | Return Points Win % | 40% (76/192) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benjamin Bonzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
51%
(
51 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
10
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
14
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
1
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Rosol Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Lukas Rosol
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Lukas Rosol
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Lukas Rosol
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Mirza Basic
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Yanaki Milev
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Lukas Rosol
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
69 of
129)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
11
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
38%
(
19 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
129)
118
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Patrik Homola
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Lukas Rosol
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Lukas Rosol
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (469/294) | Win/Loss | 55% (667/544) |
| 59% (1043/728) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1545/1360) |
| 53% (9044/7958) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (14501/13925) |
| 65% (181/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (136/137) |
| 58% (135/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (330/240) |
| 59% (129/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (176/138) |
| 65% (24/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (25/29) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 3021 | Aces Total | 4980 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1414 | Total Double Faults | 2753 |
| 1:19:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 420.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 545.66 |
| 62% (28404/45609) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39807/66550) |
| 70% (20019/28404) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (28712/39807) |
| 52% (8937/17205) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13336/26740) |
| 41% (1873/4554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (2143/5608) |
| 40% (18351/46235) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23878/65234) |
| 53% (24/21) | Slam W/L | 48% (49/54) |
| 29% (6/15) | Masters W/L | 37% (23/39) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 58% (14/10) |
| 47% (43/49) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (126/125) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (182/113) | Challenger W/L | 56% (315/249) |
| 70% (213/92) | Futures W/L | 68% (140/66) |
| 62% (445/721) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (629/1138) |
| 53% (18/34) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (27/60) |
| 53% (140/265) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (273/509) |
| 55% (113/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (227/405) |
| 88% (452/398) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (633/543) |
| 12% (452/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (633/89) |
| 23% (311/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (578/121) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
