Anna Kubareva vs Weronika Ewald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W L L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Kubareva 0 - 0 Ewald
| Kubareva | Stats | Ewald |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (3-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (16-6) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 724 | Ranking | 611 |
| 269 | Highest Rank | 611 |
| 24 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 61% (212-133) | Career Total W/L | 62% (58-36) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anna Kubareva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Anna Kubareva
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Anna Kubareva
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Michelle Dzjachangirova
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Anna Kubareva
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
19 of
28)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
53%
(
18 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
26
Total Points Won
36
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Giada Di Paola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Luciano
Player
Anna Kubareva
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
71 of
92)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ines Murta
Player
Anna Kubareva
87%
(
45 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Anna Kubareva
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Jennifer Ruggeri
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
25%
(
7 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
50 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Anna Kubareva
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Weronika Ewald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Weronika Ewald
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Mariia Tkacheva
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Sandra Samir
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Marie Weckerle
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
110)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Katie Swan
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Madelief Hageman
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Weronika Ewald
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (212/133) | Win/Loss | 62% (58/36) |
| 60% (469/314) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (127/87) |
| 54% (3821/3229) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1067/884) |
| 65% (149/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (42/22) |
| 51% (31/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (12/11) |
| 59% (32/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 248 | Aces Total | 156 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.55 |
| 1373 | Total Double Faults | 522 |
| 1:33:21 | Average Match Time | 1:40:6 |
| 486.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 464.9 |
| 67% (13804/20458) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3613/6029) |
| 59% (8079/13804) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2277/3613) |
| 41% (2761/6654) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1049/2416) |
| 50% (1518/3047) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (433/843) |
| 50% (10504/21043) | Return Points Win % | 49% (2966/6101) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (107/78) | Challenger W/L | 50% (19/19) |
| 66% (105/55) | Futures W/L | 72% (39/15) |
| 61% (210/342) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (57/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (29/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
| 52% (49/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 88% (208/183) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (54/49) |
| 12% (208/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (54/5) |
| 22% (137/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (40/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
