Andrea Raaholdt vs Oleksandra Piskun Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W L L
Form
W W L W L L L W L LH2H: Raaholdt 1 - 0 Piskun
They have played 3 sets in total, with Raaholdt winning 2 and Piskun winning 1. The last match between Raaholdt and Piskun was at the Oslo, 02-11-2015, Second, I.hard with Andrea Raaholdt getting the victory 3-6 6-4 1-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrea Raaholdt | 1 |
| Oleksandra Piskun | 0 |
Oslo(02-11-2015)
3
6
6
4
1
0
| Raaholdt | Stats | Piskun |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 845 | Highest Rank | 832 |
| 29 | Age | 33 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 47% (48-55) | Career Total W/L | 45% (135-163) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sevastova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 1-0 |
Stats 
Andrea Raaholdt
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 10 | Games Won | 10 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:26:0 | Average Match Time | 1:26:0 |
| 79% (45/57) | 1st Serve % | 50% (29/58) |
| 71% (32/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19/29) |
| 36% (4/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (17/29) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 38% (22/58) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrea Raaholdt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kruzhkova
Player
Andrea Raaholdt
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristina Schmiedlova
Player
Andrea Raaholdt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
73 of
97)
3
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
23%
(
8 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Raaholdt
Player
Mariana Drazic
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 0-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Oleksandra Piskun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mihika Yadav
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
42%
(
28 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Ho
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
12
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Helene Scholsen
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandra Piskun
Player
Yarden Akler
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
72 of
109)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
4
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
26%
(
10 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathilde Armitano
Player
Oleksandra Piskun
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
6-0 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47% (48/55) | Win/Loss | 45% (135/163) |
| 48% (109/119) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (315/356) |
| 50% (1006/1013) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2803/3008) |
| 41% (7/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (72/79) |
| 48% (27/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (47/68) |
| 47% (14/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (16/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 59 | Total Double Faults | 176 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 457.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.62 |
| 74% (1137/1536) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2143/3406) |
| 56% (640/1137) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1171/2143) |
| 39% (157/398) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (548/1263) |
| 49% (87/179) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (197/363) |
| 45% (658/1471) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1458/3293) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (10/16) | Challenger W/L | 38% (15/25) |
| 49% (38/39) | Futures W/L | 47% (120/138) |
| 46% (46/101) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (135/296) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (7/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (18/32) |
| 35% (8/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (32/77) |
| 79% (52/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (146/122) |
| 21% (52/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (146/24) |
| 12% (50/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (152/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
