Altug Celikbilek vs Sergiy Stakhovsky Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W L
Form
L W L L W W W L L LHead-2-Head: Celikbilek 2 - 1 Stakhovsky
They have played 6 sets in total, with Celikbilek winning 4 and Stakhovsky winning 2. The last match between Celikbilek and Stakhovsky was at the Porto Challenger, 03-07-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Altug Celikbilek getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Altug Celikbilek | 2 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | 1 |
Porto Challenger(03-07-2021)
6
2
6
1
| Celikbilek | Stats | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 519 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 154 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 28 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 11 |
| 57% (382-283) | Career Total W/L | 55% (676-557) |
| $231,155 | Career Prize Money | $2,604,568 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Celikbilek VS Stakhovsky H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-2 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
3
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Altug Celikbilek
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Celikbilek VS Stakhovsky H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 33 | Games Won | 24 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:25:32 | Average Match Time | 1:25:32 |
| 58% (119/206) | 1st Serve % | 56% (100/180) |
| 72% (86/119) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (74/100) |
| 44% (38/87) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (36/80) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 39% (70/180) | Return Points Win % | 40% (82/206) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Altug Celikbilek
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve %
80%
(
4 of
5)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
6
Total Points Won
1
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Pietro Marino
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sekou Bangoura
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Maxence Bertimon
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
63 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kenny de Schepper
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Peter Buldorini
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Keshav Chopra
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Yassine Smiej
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sergiy Stakhovsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
113)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Norbert Gombos
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dan Added
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dennis Novak
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (382/283) | Win/Loss | 55% (676/557) |
| 55% (852/690) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1625/1402) |
| 52% (7483/6938) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (15192/14448) |
| 61% (285/186) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (216/179) |
| 43% (30/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (112/132) |
| 56% (60/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (273/188) |
| 44% (7/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (75/58) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 2685 | Aces Total | 5829 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1819 | Total Double Faults | 2178 |
| 1:13:40 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 483.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 543.45 |
| 58% (21317/36949) | 1st Serve % | 62% (40429/65448) |
| 71% (15067/21317) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (29497/40429) |
| 48% (7571/15632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12558/25022) |
| 45% (1624/3636) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (2072/5490) |
| 40% (14655/36339) | Return Points Win % | 37% (23876/65352) |
| 36% (5/9) | Slam W/L | 48% (60/66) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 42% (37/52) |
| 53% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 63% (30/18) |
| 48% (16/17) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (206/189) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (117/108) | Challenger W/L | 60% (335/223) |
| 63% (235/141) | Futures W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 58% (375/652) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (618/1117) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (50/104) |
| 48% (89/185) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (290/548) |
| 58% (122/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (219/419) |
| 85% (372/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (677/559) |
| 15% (372/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (677/118) |
| 23% (293/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (556/117) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
