Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 1 - 3 Nakashima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 50.68% of points on their second serve, while Nakashima has won 55.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 50.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 48.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.03% and 29.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 59.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 68.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 37.21% of matches played (W/L 16/ 27), with Nakashima winning 63.22% (W/L 55/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.56% of matches (W/L 34/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Evans winning 1 times and Nakashima being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Evans winning 3 and Nakashima winning 6. The last match between Evans and Nakashima was at the cinch Championships - London, 18-06-2024, First, Grass with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 4-6 6-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Nakashima have played a deciding set 2 times, with Evans winning 1 times and Nakashima 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 0, and Nakashima 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.74 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 244.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 29.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 33.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
61
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass1
64
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
60% (555-377)
Career Total W/L
62% (199-124)
32% (8-17)
YTD W/L
69% (41-18)
$4,736,130
Career Prize Money
$1,830,310
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Evans vs Brandon Nakashima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Evans VS Nakashima
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Daniel Evans | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 6 |
| Games Won | 38 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 26 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:35 | 1:50:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (159/280) | 61% (172/280) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (101/159) | 70% (120/172) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (64/121) | 55% (59/108) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (9/23) | 41% (13/32) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (101/280) | 41% (115/280) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 ret. |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-0 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (8/17) | 69% (41/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (26/38) | 64% (88/50) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (302/342) | 54% (754/650) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 65% (13/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 107 | 465 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:36 | 1:51:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.72 | 271.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1153/2041) | 65% (2884/4418) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (837/1153) | 75% (2155/2884) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (450/888) | 56% (856/1534) |
| BPs Won% Total | 30% (49/164) | 34% (127/374) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (725/2077) | 36% (1663/4568) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 76% (26/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (8/22) | 69% (38/55) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 62% (21/34) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (3/12) | 63% (12/19) |
| 1st set W, W | 54% (13/7) | 89% (37/33) |
| 1st set W, L | 38% (13/5) | 11% (37/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 29% (21/6) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Dominic Stricker
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
1
93%
(
53 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Richard Gasquet
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
7
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
58 of
77)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
12 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Zachary Svajda
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
12
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Joao Fonseca
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mattia Bellucci
68%
(
84 of
124)
1st Serve %
58%
(
80 of
138)
17
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
11
75%
(
63 of
84)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
64 of
80)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
35 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
47 of
138)
136
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Evans are available here and Nakashima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Evans
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
