Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ziva Falkner vs Chihiro Takayama Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Falkner vs Takayama analysis and find out who is favored!
Ziva Falkner vs Chihiro Takayama Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Falkner has won 36.59% of points on his second serve, while Takayama has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Falkner, in recent form, has won 56.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Takayama has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Falkner has saved 52.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Takayama has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Falkner has won 46.03% of matches played (W/L 29/ 34), with Takayama winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Falkner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 99/ 80), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Takayama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 47/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Falkner has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 21/ 28), where as Takayama has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Falkner winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Falkner winning 2 and Takayama winning 0. The last match between Falkner and Takayama was at the W15 Antalya, 02-07-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ziva Falkner getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Falkner and Takayama have played a deciding set 0 times, with Falkner winning 0 times and Takayama 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Falkner winning 0, and Takayama 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Falkner has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.86 while Takayama has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Falkner has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Takayama has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Falkner has converted 48.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Takayama has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Falkner 1 - 0 Takayama
481
Rank
397
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
407
High
33
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
53% (129-113)
Career Total W/L
45% (188-233)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,613
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ziva Falkner | Chihiro Takayama |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) | 64% (41/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 61% (25/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (33/64) | 38% (20/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Ziva Falkner
Player
Chihiro Takayama
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ziva Falkner | Chihiro Takayama |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (13/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (137/170) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 56.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (650/964) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 52% (338/650) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 34% (108/314) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (62/119) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (432/875) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ziva Falkner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Ziva Falkner
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ziva Falkner
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
51%
(
57 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ziva Falkner
Player
Jana Vanik
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
74%
(
71 of
96)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ana Giraldi Requena
Player
Ziva Falkner
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
90)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ziva Falkner
Player
Nikol Palecek
70%
(
81 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
56 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Ziva Falkner
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Ziva Falkner
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Ziva Falkner
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mayuka Aikawa
Player
Ziva Falkner
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
51%
(
36 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chihiro Takayama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Riko Sawayanagi
Player
Chihiro Takayama
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Risa Ushijima
Player
Chihiro Takayama
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
76%
(
70 of
92)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chihiro Takayama
Player
Daria Domova
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Chihiro Takayama
Player
Ananya Yadav
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Chihiro Takayama
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
81%
(
58 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chihiro Takayama
Player
Riko Hiroshima
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Falkner Vs Takayama Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
