Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zhuoxuan Bai vs Abigail Forbes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bai vs Forbes analysis and find out who is favored!
Zhuoxuan Bai vs Abigail Forbes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bai has won 48.48% of points on his second serve, while Forbes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bai, in recent form, has won 56.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Forbes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.98% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bai has saved 42.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Forbes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bai has won 61.19% of matches played (W/L 41/ 26), with Forbes winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bai has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 105/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10). Forbes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Bai has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.5% of matches (W/L 29/ 11), where as Forbes has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bai has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.25 while Forbes has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bai has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Forbes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bai has converted 55.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Forbes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bai 0 - 0 Forbes
90
Rank
83
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
72% (121-48)
Career Total W/L
54% (20-17)
31% (5-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$132,114
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zhuoxuan Bai | Abigail Forbes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (179/185) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 20 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 239.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (781/1127) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (451/781) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (165/346) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (69/131) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (550/1208) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (5/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Zhuoxuan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aliona Falei
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Olga Danilovic
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
81%
(
101 of
124)
1st Serve %
73%
(
76 of
104)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
50%
(
51 of
101)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
52%
(
64 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
113
Total Points Won
115
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
47%
(
51 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
40%
(
23 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
49 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Zhuoxuan Bai
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Mubaraka Al-Naimi
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
13 of
29)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Abigail Forbes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
En Shuo Liang
Player
Abigail Forbes
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashley Lahey
Player
Abigail Forbes
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayo Hibi
Player
Abigail Forbes
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abigail Forbes
Player
Kylie Collins
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
71
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Bai Vs Forbes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
